Usage Score
8.8
Player Dossier
2016-2022TCU
LB • 6'2" • 231 lbs • DeSoto, TX, USA
Shawn Robinson shows a ball-hunting defender profile with partial disruption data.
Usage Score
8.8
Efficiency
30.3
Consistency
57.7
Season Value
24.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · TCU
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Shawn Robinson, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · TCU. Shawn Robinson shows a ball-hunting defender profile with partial disruption data.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season
TCU paired 0 primary output with 0.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2021 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 30.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2022 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 3 team stops, with role shifts visible across TCU, Missouri, Kansas State.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Boston College
Loss with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
6
Havoc Plays / G
1.1
Efficiency
30.3
Usage
8.8
Consistency
57.7
Best Game by takeover score
Army
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Army: 0. Central Michigan: 2. Kentucky: 0. Boston College: 2.5. North Texas: 1. Texas A&M: 1
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Army: 8 by 33.3. Central Michigan: 5 by 40.8. Kentucky: 2 by 8.3. Boston College: 4 by 41.7. North Texas: 4 by 26.7. Texas A&M: 5 by 30.8
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
6 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Boston College
Best efficiency game
41.7 vs Boston College
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
TCU
2016-2018
Opening stop
Missouri
2019-2021
Peak year stop
Kansas State
2022
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | TCU | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | TCU | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 Regular Season | TCU | 0 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 0 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Missouri | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Missouri | 1.5 | 11.9 | 2.8 | 1.5 |
| 2021 Postseason | Missouri | 6.5 | 30.3 | 8.8 | 5 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Missouri | 6.5 | 30.3 | 8.8 | 0 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Kansas State | 0 | — | — | -6.5 |
#1 Featured game
Boston College
Loss with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5
Primary metric
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 53.2 takeover score.
#2
Mississippi State
1.5
Primary metric
Loss with 1.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1.5 disruption/tackle impact with 48.1 takeover score.
#3
Central Michigan
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 43 takeover score.
#4
Texas A&M
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 28 takeover score.
#5
North Texas
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 24.6 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2018 Regular Season · TCU
0 primary output · 0.6 efficiency · 0.1 usage
33.6
#2
2017 Regular Season · TCU
33.3
0 primary · 0 efficiency · 0 usage
#3
2021 Postseason · Missouri
24.3
6.5 primary · 30.3 efficiency · 8.8 usage
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Career Facts
3
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
34
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 21 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Shawn Robinson quick answers