Usage Score
10
Player Dossier
2018-2021Oklahoma
Isaiah Thomas
DL • 6'5" • 267 lbs • Tulsa, OK, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Isaiah Thomas shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 32.8 disruption score.
Efficiency
32.8
Consistency
62.4
Season Value
41.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season · Oklahoma
1819192021
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Oklahoma
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Baylor
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Isaiah Thomas, DL. Best season Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season · Oklahoma. Isaiah Thomas shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 32.8 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season
Oklahoma paired 23.5 primary output with 32.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2021 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 32.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2021 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Texas Tech
Win with 4.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2021 Regular Season · Oklahoma
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
2.0
Efficiency
32.8
Usage
10
Consistency
62.4
Best Game by takeover score
Oklahoma State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Tulane: 2. Unknown: 2. Nebraska: 1. West Virginia: 0. Kansas State: 3. Texas: 3. TCU: 0. Kansas: 1. Texas Tech: 4.5. Baylor: 2. Iowa State: 4. Oklahoma State: 1
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Tulane: 3 by 32.5. Unknown: 3 by 32.5. Nebraska: 1 by 14.2. West Virginia: 2 by 8.3. Kansas State: 4 by 46.7. Texas: 4 by 46.7. TCU: 2 by 8.3. Kansas: 6 by 35. Texas Tech: 3 by 57.5. Baylor: 4 by 36.7. Iowa State: 3 by 52.5. Oklahoma State: 3 by 22.5
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins2.1 · Games = 9 · +0.6 vs Losses
Losses1.5 · Games = 2 · -0.6 vs Wins
First Half1.8 · Games = 6 · -0.3 vs Second Half
Second Half2.1 · Games = 6 · +0.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Texas Tech
Best efficiency game
57.5 vs Texas Tech
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 11/28 | @ Oklahoma State | L 33-37 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/20 | vs Iowa State2+ sacks · Splash game | W 28-21 | 3 | 2 | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/13 | @ Baylor | L 14-27 | 4 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/30 | vs Texas Tech | W 52-21 | 3 | 1 | — | 1.50 | 1 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 10/23 | @ Kansas | W 35-23 | 6 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/16 | vs TCU | W 52-31 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/9 | @ TexasSplash game | W 55-48 | 4 | 2 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/2 | @ Kansas StateSplash game | W 37-31 | 4 | 2 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/25 | vs West Virginia | W 16-13 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/18 | vs Nebraska | W 23-16 | 1 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/11 | vs Unknown | — | 3 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/4 | vs Tulane | W 40-35 | 3 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Oklahoma
2018-2021
Opening stop
Season Progression
20182019201920202021
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 1 | 6.7 | 0.6 | — |
| 2019 Postseason | Oklahoma | 4 | 13.8 | 4.1 | 3 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 4 | 13.8 | 4.1 | 0 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 21.5 | 33.9 | 12.2 | 17.5 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 23.5 | 32.8 | 10 | 2 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Baylor
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
5.5
Primary metric
5.5 disruption/tackle impact with 68.2 takeover score.
#2
Texas Tech
4.5
Primary metric
Win with 4.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4.5 disruption/tackle impact with 58.3 takeover score.
#3
Iowa State
4
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 51.5 takeover score.
#4
UCLA
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 46.7 takeover score.
#5
Kansas State
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 44.5 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2021 Regular Season · Oklahoma
23.5 primary output · 32.8 efficiency · 10 usage
41.3
#2
2020 Regular Season · Oklahoma
41.2
21.5 primary · 33.9 efficiency · 12.2 usage
#3
2019 Postseason · Oklahoma
10.4
4 primary · 13.8 efficiency · 4.1 usage
Milestones
1
Impact games
4
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2017 · Rating 0.9008
Memorial · Tulsa, OK
- Committed To
- Oklahoma
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2017
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
80
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 31 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.