Usage Score
5.3
Player Dossier
2017-2021Arkansas State
Caleb Bonner
LB • 6'1" • 221 lbs • Reform, AL, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Caleb Bonner shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 26 disruption score.
Efficiency
26
Consistency
8.3
Season Value
11.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Arkansas State
17181819192021
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Arkansas State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: UL Monroe
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Caleb Bonner, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Arkansas State. Caleb Bonner shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 26 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season
Arkansas State paired 0 primary output with 7.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2021 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 26 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2021 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UL Monroe
Win with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2021 Regular Season · Arkansas State
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
0.4
Efficiency
26
Usage
5.3
Consistency
8.3
Best Game by takeover score
Texas State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 0. Memphis: 0. Washington: 0. Tulsa: 0.5. Georgia Southern: 0. Coastal Carolina: 0. Louisiana: 0. South Alabama: 1. App State: 0. UL Monroe: 3.5. Georgia State: 0. Texas State: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 2 by 8.3. Memphis: 6 by 25. Washington: 4 by 16.7. Tulsa: 8 by 38.3. Georgia Southern: 10 by 41.7. Coastal Carolina: 1 by 4.2. Louisiana: 7 by 29.2. South Alabama: 7 by 39.2. App State: 5 by 20.8. UL Monroe: 5 by 55.8. Georgia State: 5 by 20.8. Texas State: 3 by 12.5
Split Comparison
Losses0.1 · n=10
First Half0.1 · n=6 · -0.7 vs Second Half
Second Half0.8 · n=6 · +0.7 vs First Half
All Games0.4 · n=12
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
UL Monroe
Best efficiency game
55.8 vs UL Monroe
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/27 | vs Texas State | L 22-24 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/20 | @ Georgia State | L 20-28 | 5 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/13 | @ UL MonroeSplash game | W 27-24 | 5 | 1 | — | 2 | 1.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/6 | vs App State | L 14-48 | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/30 | @ South Alabama | L 13-31 | 7 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 10/21 | vs Louisiana | L 27-28 | 7 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 10/7 | vs Coastal Carolina | L 20-52 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/2 | @ Georgia Southern10+ tackles | L 33-59 | 10 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/25 | @ Tulsa | L 34-41 | 8 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/18 | @ Washington | L 3-52 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/11 | vs Memphis | L 50-55 | 6 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/4 | vs Unknown | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Arkansas State
2017-2021
Opening stop
Season Progression
2017201820182019201920202021
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Regular Season | Arkansas State | 0 | 7.9 | 1.3 | — |
| 2018 Postseason | Arkansas State | 0.5 | 14.2 | 2.5 | 0.5 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Arkansas State | 0.5 | 14.2 | 2.5 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Arkansas State | 7.5 | 26.6 | 6.4 | 7 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Arkansas State | 7.5 | 26.6 | 6.4 | 0 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Arkansas State | 7 | 18.9 | 5.8 | -0.5 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Arkansas State | 5 | 26 | 5.3 | -2 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UL Monroe
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3
Primary metric
3 disruption/tackle impact with 56.2 takeover score.
#2
UL Monroe
3.5
Primary metric
Win with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3.5 disruption/tackle impact with 56.1 takeover score.
#3
Coastal Carolina
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 46.5 takeover score.
#4
South Alabama
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 35.1 takeover score.
#5
Florida International
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 32.7 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2017 Regular Season · Arkansas State
0 primary output · 7.9 efficiency · 1.3 usage
36.4
#2
2019 Postseason · Arkansas State
23.5
7.5 primary · 26.6 efficiency · 6.4 usage
#3
2019 Regular Season · Arkansas State
23.5
7.5 primary · 26.6 efficiency · 6.4 usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
2
Splash games
1
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2017 · Rating 0.7652
Tuscaloosa County · Northport, AL
- Committed To
- Arkansas State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2017
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
197
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 52 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.