Usage Score
24.3
Player Dossier
2016-2021Virginia Tech
Kalil Pimpleton
WR • 5'9" • 175 lbs • Muskegon, MI, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Kalil Pimpleton reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
85.9
Consistency
55.6
Season Value
64.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason · Central Michigan
16171919202121
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Virginia Tech • Central Michigan
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Akron
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Kalil Pimpleton, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason · Central Michigan. Kalil Pimpleton reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason
Central Michigan paired 960 primary output with 85.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2021 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 85.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2021 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Virginia Tech, Central Michigan.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Ball State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2021 Postseason · Central Michigan
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
73.8
Efficiency
85.9
Usage
24.3
Consistency
55.6
Best Game by takeover score
Washington State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Washington State: 31. Missouri: 38. Unknown: 27. LSU: 35. Florida International: 117. Miami (OH): 48. Ohio: 78. Toledo: 103. Northern Illinois: 130. Western Michigan: 115. Kent State: 56. Ball State: 144. Eastern Michigan: 38
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Washington State: 4 by 51.7. Missouri: 4 by 63.3. Unknown: 2 by 90. LSU: 3 by 77.8. Florida International: 8 by 97.5. Miami (OH): 4 by 80. Ohio: 5 by 100. Toledo: 6 by 100. Northern Illinois: 6 by 100. Western Michigan: 5 by 100. Kent State: 4 by 93.3. Ball State: 7 by 100. Eastern Michigan: 4 by 63.3
Split Comparison
Wins85.3 · n=8 · +22.5 vs Losses
Losses62.8 · n=4 · -22.5 vs Wins
First Half53.4 · n=7 · -44.2 vs Second Half
Second Half97.7 · n=6 · +44.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Ball State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Ball State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/31 | vs Washington State | W 24-21 | — | 4 | 31 | 7.4 | 7.80 | 0 | 26 |
| Fri 11/26 | vs Eastern Michigan | W 31-10 | — | 4 | 38 | 10.2 | 9.50 | 0 | 14 |
| Thu 11/18 | @ Ball State100 receiving yards | W 37-17 | — | 7 | 144 | 20.6 | 20.60 | 1 | 50 |
| Thu 11/11 | vs Kent State | W 54-30 | — | 4 | 56 | 10.2 | 14 | 0 | 29 |
| Wed 11/3 | @ Western Michigan100 receiving yards | W 42-30 | — | 5 | 115 | 23 | 23 | 1 | 50 |
| Sat 10/23 | vs Northern Illinois100 receiving yards | L 38-39 | — | 6 | 130 | 21.7 | 21.70 | 1 | 72 |
| Sat 10/16 | vs Toledo100 receiving yards | W 26-23 | — | 6 | 103 | 12 | 17.20 | 0 | 42 |
| Sat 10/9 | @ Ohio | W 30-27 | — | 5 | 78 | 14.2 | 15.60 | 1 | 28 |
| Sat 10/2 | @ Miami (OH) | L 17-28 | — | 4 | 48 | 10.5 | 12 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 9/25 | vs Florida International100 receiving yards · High volume | W 31-27 | — | 8 | 117 | 11.4 | 14.60 | 0 | 38 |
| Sat 9/18 | @ LSU | L 21-49 | — | 3 | 35 | 11.7 | 11.70 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 9/11 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 27 | 12.4 | 13.50 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 9/4 | @ Missouri | L 24-34 | — | 4 | 38 | 7.8 | 9.50 | 0 | 27 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Virginia Tech
2016-2017
Opening stop
- 2
Central Michigan
2019-2021
Final stop
Season Progression
2016201720192019202020212021
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Virginia Tech | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | Virginia Tech | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Central Michigan | 894 | 68.9 | 29.3 | 894 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 894 | 68.9 | 29.3 | 0 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 257 | 70.5 | 24.1 | -637 |
| 2021 Postseason | Central Michigan | 960 | 85.9 | 24.3 | 703 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 960 | 85.9 | 24.3 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Akron
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
116
Primary metric
116 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Ball State
144
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
144 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Eastern Michigan
112
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
112 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Western Michigan
115
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
115 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Northern Illinois
130
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
130 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2021 Postseason · Central Michigan
960 primary output · 85.9 efficiency · 24.3 usage
64.9
#2
2021 Regular Season · Central Michigan
64.9
960 primary · 85.9 efficiency · 24.3 usage
#3
2019 Postseason · Central Michigan
63.8
894 primary · 68.9 efficiency · 29.3 usage
Milestones
7
100+ receiving yards
3
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
2
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
2,111
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 34 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.