Usage Score
5.3
Player Dossier
2017-2020Duke
Michael Carter II
S • 5'11" • 190 lbs • Douglasville, GA, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Michael Carter II shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 27.3 disruption score.
Efficiency
27.3
Consistency
53.4
Season Value
27.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season · Duke
1717181920
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Duke
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Northwestern
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Michael Carter II, S. Best season Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season · Duke. Michael Carter II shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 27.3 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season
Duke paired 13 primary output with 27.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2020 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 27.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2020 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Miami
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2020 Regular Season · Duke
Games
11
Havoc Plays / G
1.2
Efficiency
27.3
Usage
5.3
Consistency
53.4
Best Game by takeover score
Florida State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Notre Dame: 0. Boston College: 2. Virginia: 0. Virginia Tech: 2. Syracuse: 0. NC State: 0. Charlotte: 2. North Carolina: 2. Georgia Tech: 2. Miami: 3. Florida State: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Notre Dame: 6 by 25. Boston College: 4 by 36.7. Virginia: 2 by 8.3. Virginia Tech: 4 by 36.7. Syracuse: 2 by 8.3. NC State: 3 by 12.5. Charlotte: 8 by 53.3. North Carolina: 2 by 28.3. Georgia Tech: 7 by 49.2. Miami: 2 by 38.3. Florida State: 1 by 4.2
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins1 · Games = 2 · -0.2 vs Losses
Losses1.2 · Games = 9 · +0.2 vs Wins
First Half0.7 · Games = 6 · -1.1 vs Second Half
Second Half1.8 · Games = 5 · +1.1 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Miami
Best efficiency game
53.3 vs Charlotte
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/12 | @ Florida State | L 35-56 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 12/6 | vs Miami | L 0-48 | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sun 11/29 | @ Georgia TechSplash game | L 33-56 | 7 | 6 | — | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/7 | vs North Carolina | L 24-56 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/31 | vs Charlotte | W 53-19 | 8 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 10/17 | @ NC State | L 20-31 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/10 | @ Syracuse | W 38-24 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/3 | vs Virginia Tech | L 31-38 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 9/26 | @ Virginia | L 20-38 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/19 | vs Boston College | L 6-26 | 4 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/12 | @ Notre Dame | L 13-27 | 6 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Duke
2017-2020
Opening stop
Season Progression
20172017201820192020
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Postseason | Duke | 5.5 | 14.5 | 3.2 | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | Duke | 5.5 | 14.5 | 3.2 | 0 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Duke | 7 | 16.6 | 2 | 1.5 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Duke | 10.5 | 27.2 | 5.6 | 3.5 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Duke | 13 | 27.3 | 5.3 | 2.5 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Northwestern
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4
Primary metric
4 disruption/tackle impact with 60.9 takeover score.
#2
Northern Illinois
2.5
Primary metric
Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 49.2 takeover score.
#3
Miami
3
Primary metric
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 49 takeover score.
#4
Miami
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 48.2 takeover score.
#5
Notre Dame
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 46 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2020 Regular Season · Duke
13 primary output · 27.3 efficiency · 5.3 usage
27.5
#2
2019 Regular Season · Duke
26.3
10.5 primary · 27.2 efficiency · 5.6 usage
#3
2018 Regular Season · Duke
11.2
7 primary · 16.6 efficiency · 2 usage
Milestones
1
Impact games
2
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2024 · Rating 0.8977
Grayson · Loganville, GA
- Committed To
- UCF
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2024
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
135
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 42 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.