Usage Score
7.5
Player Dossier
2018-2022Oklahoma
C.J. Coldon
DB • 5'11" • 185 lbs • Belleville, IL, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
C.J. Coldon shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 30.3 disruption score.
Efficiency
30.3
Consistency
45.8
Season Value
25.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season · Wyoming
181920212122
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Wyoming • Oklahoma
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Air Force
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
C.J. Coldon, DB. Best season Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season · Wyoming. C.J. Coldon shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 30.3 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season
Wyoming paired 6 primary output with 28.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 30.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2022 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Wyoming, Oklahoma.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Oklahoma State
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2022 Regular Season · Oklahoma
Games
9
Havoc Plays / G
1.2
Efficiency
30.3
Usage
7.5
Consistency
45.8
Best Game by takeover score
Texas Tech
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. UTEP: 0. Kent State: 0. Nebraska: 0. Texas: 2. Kansas: 1. Baylor: 0. West Virginia: 1. Oklahoma State: 4. Texas Tech: 3
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UTEP: 2 by 8.3. Kent State: 1 by 4.2. Nebraska: 1 by 4.2. Texas: 3 by 32.5. Kansas: 2 by 18.3. Baylor: 2 by 8.3. West Virginia: 9 by 47.5. Oklahoma State: 7 by 69.2. Texas Tech: 12 by 80
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins1 · Games = 5 · -0.5 vs Losses
Losses1.5 · Games = 4 · +0.5 vs Wins
First Half0.6 · Games = 5 · -1.4 vs Second Half
Second Half2 · Games = 4 · +1.4 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Oklahoma State
Best efficiency game
80 vs Texas Tech
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 11/27 | @ Texas Tech10+ tackles | L 48-51 | 12 | 9 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | — | — |
| Sun 11/20 | vs Oklahoma State | W 28-13 | 7 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | — | — |
| Sat 11/12 | @ West Virginia | L 20-23 | 9 | 5 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Baylor | L 35-38 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Kansas | W 52-42 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/8 | vs TexasSplash game | L 0-49 | 3 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Nebraska | W 49-14 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Kent State | W 33-3 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/3 | vs UTEP | W 45-13 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Wyoming
2018-2021
Opening stop
- 2
Oklahoma
2022
Final stop
Season Progression
201820192020202120212022
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | Wyoming | 1 | 14.5 | 1.8 | — |
| 2019 Regular Season | Wyoming | 3 | 29.4 | 5.5 | 2 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Wyoming | 6 | 28.1 | 6.8 | 3 |
| 2021 Postseason | Wyoming | 15.5 | 33.4 | 9 | 9.5 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Wyoming | 15.5 | 33.4 | 9 | 0 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 11 | 30.3 | 7.5 | -4.5 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Air Force
Loss with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4
Primary metric
4 disruption/tackle impact with 67.4 takeover score.
#2
Oklahoma State
4
Primary metric
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 58.5 takeover score.
#3
Texas Tech
3
Primary metric
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 56.7 takeover score.
#4
Texas State
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 53.1 takeover score.
#5
New Mexico
1.5
Primary metric
Loss with 1.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1.5 disruption/tackle impact with 49.7 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2020 Regular Season · Wyoming
6 primary output · 28.1 efficiency · 6.8 usage
30.4
#2
2021 Postseason · Wyoming
28.6
15.5 primary · 33.4 efficiency · 9 usage
#3
2021 Regular Season · Wyoming
28.6
15.5 primary · 33.4 efficiency · 9 usage
Milestones
1
Impact games
1
Splash games
1
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
2
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
154
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 34 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.