Usage Score
11.6
Player Dossier
2017-2021Houston
David Anenih
DL • 6'3" • 249 lbs • Arlington, TX, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
David Anenih shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 21.1 disruption score.
Efficiency
28.7
Consistency
35.5
Season Value
31.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason · Houston
17181920202121
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Houston
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Tulane
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
David Anenih, DL. Best season Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason · Houston. David Anenih shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 21.1 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason
Houston paired 12 primary output with 27.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 28.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2021 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tulane
Loss with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Regular Season · Houston
Games
9
Havoc Plays / G
1.7
Efficiency
28.7
Usage
11.6
Consistency
35.5
Best Game by takeover score
Tulsa
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Oklahoma: 0.5. Unknown: 0.5. Washington State: 4. Tulane: 5. North Texas: 2. Cincinnati: 1. UConn: 1.5. SMU: 0.5. Tulsa: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oklahoma: 2 by 13.3. Unknown: 3 by 17.5. Washington State: 2 by 48.3. Tulane: 8 by 83.3. North Texas: 1 by 24.2. Cincinnati: 3 by 22.5. UConn: 1 by 19.2. SMU: 2 by 13.3. Tulsa: 4 by 16.7
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins1.2 · Games = 3 · -1.0 vs Losses
Losses2.2 · Games = 5 · +1.0 vs Wins
First Half2.4 · Games = 5 · +1.6 vs Second Half
Second Half0.8 · Games = 4 · -1.6 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Tulane
Best efficiency game
83.3 vs Tulane
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 11/24 | @ Tulsa | W 24-14 | 4 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 10/24 | vs SMU | L 31-34 | 2 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/19 | @ UConn | W 24-17 | 1 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/12 | vs Cincinnati | L 23-38 | 3 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/29 | @ North Texas | W 46-25 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Fri 9/20 | @ Tulane2+ sacks · Splash game | L 31-38 | 8 | 5 | — | 2.50 | 2.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Washington State2+ sacks · Splash game | L 24-31 | 2 | 2 | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/8 | vs Unknown | — | 3 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/1 | @ Oklahoma | L 31-49 | 2 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Houston
2017-2021
Opening stop
Season Progression
2017201820192020202020212021
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Regular Season | Houston | 4 | 21.7 | 7.1 | — |
| 2018 Regular Season | Houston | 11.5 | 19.9 | 8.4 | 7.5 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Houston | 15 | 28.7 | 11.6 | 3.5 |
| 2020 Postseason | Houston | 12 | 27.3 | 8.8 | -3 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Houston | 12 | 27.3 | 8.8 | 0 |
| 2021 Postseason | Houston | 17 | 21.1 | 6.5 | 5 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Houston | 17 | 21.1 | 6.5 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Tulane
Loss with backfield disruption leading the way.
5
Primary metric
5 disruption/tackle impact with 72.5 takeover score.
#2
Tulane
4
Primary metric
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 56.6 takeover score.
#3
South Florida
4
Primary metric
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 54.5 takeover score.
#4
Washington State
4
Primary metric
Loss with backfield disruption leading the way.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 54.4 takeover score.
#5
Tulsa
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 53.4 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2020 Postseason · Houston
12 primary output · 27.3 efficiency · 8.8 usage
35.1
#2
2020 Regular Season · Houston
35.1
12 primary · 27.3 efficiency · 8.8 usage
#3
2021 Postseason · Houston
34.1
17 primary · 21.1 efficiency · 6.5 usage
Milestones
1
Impact games
4
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2017 · Rating 0.8389
Mansfield Timberview · Arlington, TX
- Committed To
- Houston
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2017
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
99
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 43 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.