Usage Score
12
Player Dossier
2017-2020Houston
Grant Stuard
LB • 6'1" • 225 lbs • Conroe, TX, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Grant Stuard shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 44.9 disruption score.
Efficiency
44
Consistency
55.3
Season Value
31.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Houston
1718181920
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Houston
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Memphis
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Grant Stuard, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Houston. Grant Stuard shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 44.9 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season
Houston paired 0 primary output with 8.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 44 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2020 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Game with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Regular Season · Houston
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
1.2
Efficiency
44
Usage
12
Consistency
55.3
Best Game by takeover score
Navy
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Oklahoma: 0. Unknown: 3. Washington State: 1. Tulane: 0. North Texas: 1. Cincinnati: 1. UConn: 2. SMU: 1.5. UCF: 0. Memphis: 0.5. Tulsa: 3. Navy: 1.5
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oklahoma: 14 by 50. Unknown: 8 by 63.3. Washington State: 6 by 35. Tulane: 5 by 20.8. North Texas: 11 by 55.8. Cincinnati: 4 by 26.7. UConn: 15 by 70. SMU: 6 by 40. UCF: 3 by 12.5. Memphis: 9 by 42.5. Tulsa: 6 by 55. Navy: 10 by 56.7
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins2 · Games = 3 · +1.3 vs Losses
Losses0.7 · Games = 8 · -1.3 vs Wins
First Half1 · Games = 6 · -0.4 vs Second Half
Second Half1.4 · Games = 6 · +0.4 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Unknown
Best efficiency game
70 vs UConn
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 12/1 | vs Navy10+ tackles | L 41-56 | 10 | 5 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 11/24 | @ Tulsa | W 24-14 | 6 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 11/16 | vs Memphis | L 27-45 | 9 | 3 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/2 | @ UCF | L 29-44 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 10/24 | vs SMU | L 31-34 | 6 | 4 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/19 | @ UConn10+ tackles · Splash game | W 24-17 | 15 | 6 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/12 | vs Cincinnati | L 23-38 | 4 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/29 | @ North Texas10+ tackles | W 46-25 | 11 | 9 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 9/20 | @ Tulane | L 31-38 | 5 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Washington State | L 24-31 | 6 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/8 | vs UnknownSplash game | — | 8 | 7 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/1 | @ Oklahoma10+ tackles | L 31-49 | 14 | 9 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Houston
2017-2020
Opening stop
Season Progression
20172018201820192020
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Regular Season | Houston | 0 | 8.3 | 1.7 | — |
| 2018 Postseason | Houston | 2.5 | 11.5 | 2.2 | 2.5 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Houston | 2.5 | 11.5 | 2.2 | 0 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Houston | 14.5 | 44 | 12 | 12 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Houston | 6 | 44.9 | 10.8 | -8.5 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Memphis
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2
Primary metric
2 disruption/tackle impact with 62.2 takeover score.
#2
UCF
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 61.6 takeover score.
#3
Unknown
3
Primary metric
Game with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 60.4 takeover score.
#4
UConn
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 55.9 takeover score.
#5
Tulsa
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 54.8 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2017 Regular Season · Houston
0 primary output · 8.3 efficiency · 1.7 usage
36.7
#2
2019 Regular Season · Houston
31.5
14.5 primary · 44 efficiency · 12 usage
#3
2020 Regular Season · Houston
28.8
6 primary · 44.9 efficiency · 10.8 usage
Milestones
3
Impact games
3
Splash games
6
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2017 · Rating 0.7785
Oak Ridge · Conroe, TX
- Committed To
- Houston
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2017
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
190
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 33 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.