Usage Score
13.5
Player Dossier
2018-2021Houston
Bryson Smith
WR • 6'0" • 170 lbs • Tyler, TX, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Bryson Smith reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
58.1
Consistency
44.7
Season Value
46.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season · Houston
1818192021
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Houston
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Temple
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Bryson Smith, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season · Houston. Bryson Smith reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season
Houston paired 173 primary output with 73.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 58.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2021 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Temple
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Postseason · Houston
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
23.8
Efficiency
58.1
Usage
13.5
Consistency
44.7
Best Game by takeover score
Army
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Army: 0. Rice: 25. Arizona: 29. Texas Tech: 33. Unknown: 0. Tulsa: 15. East Carolina: 26. Navy: 10. South Florida: -5. SMU: 30. Temple: 117. Tulane: 5
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Rice: 1 by 100. Arizona: 4 by 48.3. Texas Tech: 2 by 100. Unknown: 1 by 0. Tulsa: 1 by 100. East Carolina: 3 by 57.8. Navy: 1 by 66.7. South Florida: 4 by 0. SMU: 4 by 50. Temple: 7 by 100. Tulane: 2 by 16.7
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins15 · Games = 7 · -30 vs Losses
Losses45 · Games = 4 · +30 vs Wins
First Half17 · Games = 6 · -13.5 vs Second Half
Second Half30.5 · Games = 6 · +13.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Temple
Best efficiency game
100 vs Temple
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/22 | @ Army | L 14-70 | — | — | — | -10 | — | — | — |
| Fri 11/16 | vs Tulane | W 48-17 | — | 2 | 5 | 5.5 | 2.50 | 0 | 7 |
| Sun 11/11 | vs Temple100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | L 49-59 | — | 7 | 117 | 12.5 | 16.70 | 3 | 30 |
| Sat 11/3 | @ SMU | L 31-45 | — | 4 | 30 | 7.5 | 7.50 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 10/27 | vs South Florida | W 57-36 | — | 4 | -5 | -1.6 | -1.30 | 0 | 2 |
| Sat 10/20 | @ Navy | W 49-36 | — | 1 | 10 | 6 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 10/13 | @ East Carolina | W 42-20 | — | 3 | 26 | 14.8 | 8.70 | 0 | 18 |
| Fri 10/5 | vs Tulsa | W 41-26 | — | 1 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
| Sun 9/23 | vs Unknown | — | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 9/15 | @ Texas Tech | L 49-63 | — | 2 | 33 | 4.4 | 16.50 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 9/8 | vs Arizona | W 45-18 | — | 4 | 29 | 6.2 | 7.30 | 1 | 13 |
| Sat 9/1 | @ Rice | W 45-27 | — | 1 | 25 | 9.6 | 25 | 0 | 25 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Houston
2018-2021
Opening stop
Season Progression
20182018201920202021
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Postseason | Houston | 285 | 58.1 | 13.5 | — |
| 2018 Regular Season | Houston | 285 | 58.1 | 13.5 | 0 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Houston | 62 | 39 | 10 | -223 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Houston | 173 | 73.8 | 12.5 | 111 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Houston | 0 | — | — | -173 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Temple
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
117
Primary metric
117 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
South Florida
45
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
45 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Washington State
24
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
24 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
#4
UCF
38
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
38 receiving yards with a 84.4 efficiency score.
#5
Cincinnati
31
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
31 receiving yards with a 68.9 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2020 Regular Season · Houston
173 primary output · 73.8 efficiency · 12.5 usage
48.4
#2
2018 Postseason · Houston
46.9
285 primary · 58.1 efficiency · 13.5 usage
#3
2018 Regular Season · Houston
46.9
285 primary · 58.1 efficiency · 13.5 usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
520
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 28 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.