Usage Score
21.9
Player Dossier
2017-2020Akron
Nate Stewart
WR • 6'2" • 200 lbs • Bethlehem, PA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Nate Stewart reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
77.8
Consistency
66
Season Value
66.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Akron
17181920
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Akron
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Illinois
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Nate Stewart, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Akron. Nate Stewart reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season
Akron paired 529 primary output with 77.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 77.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2020 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Illinois
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 90th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Regular Season · Akron
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
48.1
Efficiency
77.8
Usage
21.9
Consistency
66
Best Game by takeover score
Miami (OH)
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Illinois: 79. UAB: 28. Central Michigan: 78. Troy: 89. Massachusetts: 46. Kent State: 71. Buffalo: 42. Northern Illinois: 4. Bowling Green: 26. Eastern Michigan: 0. Miami (OH): 66
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Illinois: 5 by 100. UAB: 4 by 46.7. Central Michigan: 5 by 100. Troy: 4 by 100. Massachusetts: 4 by 76.7. Kent State: 4 by 100. Buffalo: 4 by 70. Northern Illinois: 1 by 26.7. Bowling Green: 3 by 57.8. Miami (OH): 3 by 100
Split Comparison
Losses48.1 · n=11
First Half65.2 · n=6 · +37.6 vs Second Half
Second Half27.6 · n=5 · -37.6 vs First Half
All Games48.1 · n=11
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Illinois
Best efficiency game
100 vs Miami (OH)
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 11/21 | @ Miami (OH) | L 17-20 | — | 3 | 66 | 22 | 22 | 0 | 40 |
| Tue 11/12 | vs Eastern Michigan | L 14-42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/2 | @ Bowling Green | L 6-35 | — | 3 | 26 | 8.7 | 8.70 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 10/26 | @ Northern Illinois | L 0-49 | — | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 10/19 | vs Buffalo | L 0-21 | — | 4 | 42 | 10.5 | 10.50 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/12 | vs Kent State | L 3-26 | — | 4 | 71 | 17.8 | 17.80 | 0 | 35 |
| Sat 9/28 | @ Massachusetts | L 29-37 | — | 4 | 46 | 11.5 | 11.50 | 1 | 17 |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Troy | L 7-35 | — | 4 | 89 | 22.3 | 22.30 | 0 | 49 |
| Sat 9/14 | @ Central Michigan | L 24-45 | — | 5 | 78 | 15.6 | 15.60 | 1 | 22 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs UAB | L 20-31 | — | 4 | 28 | 7 | 7 | 1 | 10 |
| Sat 8/31 | @ Illinois | L 3-42 | — | 5 | 79 | 15.8 | 15.80 | 0 | 28 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Akron
2017-2020
Opening stop
Season Progression
2017201820192020
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Regular Season | Akron | 45 | 62.2 | 5.5 | — |
| 2018 Regular Season | Akron | 280 | 75.3 | 18.1 | 235 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Akron | 529 | 77.8 | 21.9 | 249 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Akron | 217 | 71.4 | 20.8 | -312 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Illinois
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
79
Primary metric
79 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Troy
89
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
89 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Kent State
68
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
68 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Central Michigan
62
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
62 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Central Michigan
78
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
78 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2019 Regular Season · Akron
529 primary output · 77.8 efficiency · 21.9 usage
66.1
#2
2018 Regular Season · Akron
54
280 primary · 75.3 efficiency · 18.1 usage
#3
2020 Regular Season · Akron
49.8
217 primary · 71.4 efficiency · 20.8 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
1,071
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 28 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.