Usage Score
23.2
Player Dossier
2017-2020Clemson
Amari Rodgers
WR • 5'10" • 210 lbs • Knoxville, TN, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Amari Rodgers reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
79.6
Consistency
70.2
Season Value
68.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason · Clemson
1717181819192020
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Clemson
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Florida State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Amari Rodgers, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason · Clemson. Amari Rodgers reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason
Clemson paired 1,020 primary output with 79.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2020 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 79.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2020 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Georgia Tech
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2020 Postseason · Clemson
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
85
Efficiency
79.6
Usage
23.2
Consistency
70.2
Best Game by takeover score
Ohio State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Ohio State: 54. Wake Forest: 90. Unknown: 44. Virginia: 72. Miami: 62. Georgia Tech: 161. Syracuse: 91. Boston College: 66. Notre Dame: 134. Pittsburgh: 93. Virginia Tech: 32. Notre Dame: 121
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ohio State: 8 by 45. Wake Forest: 5 by 100. Unknown: 1 by 100. Virginia: 6 by 80. Miami: 7 by 59. Georgia Tech: 6 by 100. Syracuse: 8 by 75.8. Boston College: 7 by 62.9. Notre Dame: 8 by 100. Pittsburgh: 10 by 62. Virginia Tech: 3 by 71.1. Notre Dame: 8 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins87.6 · n=9 · -6.4 vs Losses
Losses94 · n=2 · +6.4 vs Wins
First Half80.5 · n=6 · -9 vs Second Half
Second Half89.5 · n=6 · +9 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Georgia Tech
Best efficiency game
100 vs Notre Dame
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 1/2 | vs Ohio StateHigh volume | L 28-49 | — | 8 | 54 | 6.8 | 6.80 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 12/19 | @ Notre Dame100 receiving yards · High volume | W 34-10 | — | 8 | 121 | 15.1 | 15.10 | 1 | 67 |
| Sun 12/6 | @ Virginia Tech | W 45-10 | — | 3 | 32 | 10.7 | 10.70 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 11/28 | vs PittsburghHigh volume | W 52-17 | — | 10 | 93 | 9.3 | 9.30 | 0 | 19 |
| Sun 11/8 | @ Notre Dame100 receiving yards · High volume | L 40-47 | — | 8 | 134 | 16.8 | 16.80 | 0 | 35 |
| Sat 10/31 | vs Boston College | W 34-28 | — | 7 | 66 | 9.4 | 9.40 | 1 | 20 |
| Sat 10/24 | vs SyracuseHigh volume | W 47-21 | — | 8 | 91 | 11.4 | 11.40 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 10/17 | @ Georgia Tech100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 73-7 | — | 6 | 161 | 26.8 | 26.80 | 2 | 83 |
| Sat 10/10 | vs Miami | W 42-17 | — | 7 | 62 | 8.9 | 8.90 | 0 | 14 |
| Sun 10/4 | vs Virginia2+ TD | W 41-23 | — | 6 | 72 | 12 | 12 | 2 | 27 |
| Sat 9/19 | vs Unknown | — | — | 1 | 44 | 44 | 44 | 1 | 44 |
| Sat 9/12 | @ Wake Forest | W 37-13 | — | 5 | 90 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 36 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Clemson
2017-2020
Opening stop
Season Progression
20172017201820182019201920202020
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Postseason | Clemson | 123 | 47.9 | 7.4 | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | Clemson | 123 | 47.9 | 7.4 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Clemson | 575 | 55.9 | 18.3 | 452 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Clemson | 575 | 55.9 | 18.3 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Clemson | 426 | 56.2 | 11.4 | -149 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Clemson | 426 | 56.2 | 11.4 | 0 |
| 2020 Postseason | Clemson | 1,020 | 79.6 | 23.2 | 594 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Clemson | 1,020 | 79.6 | 23.2 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Florida State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
156
Primary metric
156 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Georgia Tech
161
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
161 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Syracuse
121
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
121 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Notre Dame
134
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
134 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Notre Dame
121
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
121 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2020 Postseason · Clemson
1,020 primary output · 79.6 efficiency · 23.2 usage
68.3
#2
2020 Regular Season · Clemson
68.3
1,020 primary · 79.6 efficiency · 23.2 usage
#3
2018 Postseason · Clemson
42.4
575 primary · 55.9 efficiency · 18.3 usage
Milestones
5
100+ receiving yards
5
8+ catch outings
4
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2017 · Rating 0.9453
Knoxville Catholic · Knoxville, TN
- Committed To
- Clemson
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2017
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
2,144
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 52 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.