Usage Score
16.1
Player Dossier
2017-2018UAB
Andre Wilson
WR • 5'10" • 180 lbs • Converse, TX, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Andre Wilson reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
86.6
Consistency
65.9
Season Value
60.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · UAB
17171818
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- UAB
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: North Texas
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Andre Wilson, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · UAB. Andre Wilson reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason
UAB paired 677 primary output with 74.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 86.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Texas A&M
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Postseason · UAB
Games
14
Receiving Yards / G
34.7
Efficiency
86.6
Usage
16.1
Consistency
65.9
Best Game by takeover score
Northern Illinois
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011121314
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Northern Illinois: 0. Unknown: 37. Coastal Carolina: 27. Tulane: 30. Charlotte: 67. Louisiana Tech: 0. Rice: 43. North Texas: 39. UTEP: 19. UTSA: 39. Southern Miss: 44. Texas A&M: 89. Middle Tennessee: 12. Middle Tennessee: 40
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 3 by 82.2. Coastal Carolina: 2 by 90. Tulane: 3 by 66.7. Charlotte: 2 by 100. Rice: 4 by 71.7. North Texas: 2 by 100. UTEP: 2 by 63.3. UTSA: 1 by 100. Southern Miss: 2 by 100. Texas A&M: 7 by 84.8. Middle Tennessee: 1 by 80. Middle Tennessee: 1 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins32.1 · n=10 · -10.6 vs Losses
Losses42.7 · n=3 · +10.6 vs Wins
First Half29.1 · n=7 · -11.1 vs Second Half
Second Half40.3 · n=7 · +11.1 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Texas A&M
Best efficiency game
100 vs Middle Tennessee
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 12/19 | @ Northern Illinois | W 37-13 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 12/1 | @ Middle Tennessee | W 27-25 | — | 1 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 1 | 40 |
| Sat 11/24 | @ Middle Tennessee | L 3-27 | — | 1 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| Sun 11/18 | @ Texas A&M2+ TD | L 20-41 | — | 7 | 89 | 12.7 | 12.70 | 2 | 25 |
| Sun 11/11 | vs Southern Miss | W 26-23 | — | 2 | 44 | 13.5 | 22 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 11/3 | vs UTSA | W 52-3 | — | 1 | 39 | 32.3 | 39 | 0 | 39 |
| Sat 10/27 | @ UTEP | W 19-0 | — | 2 | 19 | 11 | 9.50 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 10/20 | vs North Texas | W 29-21 | — | 2 | 39 | 19.5 | 19.50 | 0 | 34 |
| Sat 10/13 | @ Rice | W 42-0 | — | 4 | 43 | 12.6 | 10.80 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 10/6 | @ Louisiana Tech | W 28-7 | — | — | — | 2 | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/29 | vs Charlotte | W 28-7 | — | 2 | 67 | 33.5 | 33.50 | 1 | 35 |
| Sat 9/15 | vs Tulane | W 31-24 | — | 3 | 30 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 9/8 | @ Coastal Carolina | L 24-47 | — | 2 | 27 | 13.5 | 13.50 | 0 | 16 |
| Fri 8/31 | vs Unknown | — | — | 3 | 37 | 12.3 | 12.30 | 1 | 14 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UAB
2017-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
2017201720182018
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Postseason | UAB | 677 | 74.3 | 25.8 | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | UAB | 677 | 74.3 | 25.8 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | UAB | 486 | 86.6 | 16.1 | -191 |
| 2018 Regular Season | UAB | 486 | 86.6 | 16.1 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
North Texas
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
150
Primary metric
150 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Texas A&M
89
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
89 receiving yards with a 84.8 efficiency score.
#3
Louisiana Tech
105
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
105 receiving yards with a 87.5 efficiency score.
#4
Charlotte
67
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
67 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Southern Miss
44
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
44 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2017 Postseason · UAB
677 primary output · 74.3 efficiency · 25.8 usage
64.8
#2
2017 Regular Season · UAB
64.8
677 primary · 74.3 efficiency · 25.8 usage
#3
2018 Postseason · UAB
60.7
486 primary · 86.6 efficiency · 16.1 usage
Milestones
2
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
1,163
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 27 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.