Usage Score
20
Player Dossier
2017-2018UAB
WR • 6'3" • 215 lbs • Reseda, CA, USA
Xavier Ubosi reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
20
Efficiency
81.1
Consistency
52.8
Season Value
63.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · UAB
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Xavier Ubosi, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · UAB. Xavier Ubosi reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
UAB paired 697 primary output with 81.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 81.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Rice
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
53.6
Efficiency
81.1
Usage
20
Consistency
52.8
Best Game by takeover score
Northern Illinois
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Northern Illinois: 87. Unknown: 48. Coastal Carolina: -5. Charlotte: 46. Louisiana Tech: 50. Rice: 196. North Texas: 36. UTEP: 7. UTSA: 72. Southern Miss: 55. Texas A&M: 81. Middle Tennessee: 8. Middle Tennessee: 16
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Northern Illinois: 3 by 100. Unknown: 1 by 100. Coastal Carolina: 1 by 0. Charlotte: 2 by 100. Louisiana Tech: 2 by 100. Rice: 4 by 100. North Texas: 1 by 100. UTEP: 1 by 46.7. UTSA: 3 by 100. Southern Miss: 3 by 100. Texas A&M: 6 by 90. Middle Tennessee: 3 by 17.8. Middle Tennessee: 1 by 100
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Rice
Best efficiency game
100 vs Northern Illinois
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 12/19 | @ Northern Illinois | W 37-13 | — | 3 | 87 | 29 | 29 | 1 | 70 |
| Sat 12/1 | @ Middle Tennessee | W 27-25 | — | 1 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 11/24 | @ Middle Tennessee | L 3-27 | — | 3 | 8 | 2.7 | 2.70 | 0 | 8 |
| Sun 11/18 | @ Texas A&M | L 20-41 | — | 6 | 81 | 13.5 | 13.50 | 0 | 31 |
| Sun 11/11 | vs Southern Miss | W 26-23 | — | 3 | 55 | 18.3 | 18.30 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 11/3 | vs UTSA2+ TD | W 52-3 | — | 3 | 72 | 24 | 24 | 2 | 31 |
| Sat 10/27 | @ UTEP | W 19-0 | — | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 10/20 | vs North Texas | W 29-21 | — | 1 | 36 | 36 | 36 | 0 | 36 |
| Sat 10/13 | @ Rice100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 42-0 | — | 4 | 196 | 49 | 49 | 2 | 95 |
| Sat 10/6 | @ Louisiana Tech | W 28-7 | — | 2 | 50 | 25 | 25 | 1 | 40 |
| Sat 9/29 | vs Charlotte | W 28-7 | — | 2 | 46 | 23 | 23 | 0 | 37 |
| Sat 9/8 | @ Coastal Carolina | L 24-47 | — | 1 | -5 | -5 | -5 | 0 | 0 |
| Fri 8/31 | vs Unknown | — | — | 1 | 48 | 48 | 48 | 0 | 48 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
UAB
2017-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Postseason | UAB | 228 | 73.6 | 11 | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | UAB | 228 | 73.6 | 11 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | UAB | 697 | 81.1 | 20 | 469 |
| 2018 Regular Season | UAB | 697 | 81.1 | 20 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Rice
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
196
Primary metric
196 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Florida
74
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
74 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Southern Miss
60
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
60 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Northern Illinois
87
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
87 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
UTSA
72
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
72 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2018 Postseason · UAB
697 primary output · 81.1 efficiency · 20 usage
63.5
#2
2018 Regular Season · UAB
63.5
697 primary · 81.1 efficiency · 20 usage
#3
2017 Postseason · UAB
41.6
228 primary · 73.6 efficiency · 11 usage
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
925
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 20 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Xavier Ubosi quick answers