Usage Score
5
Player Dossier
2017-2018UAB
S • 6'1" • 200 lbs • West Columbia, TX, USA
Broderick Thomas shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 23.7 disruption score.
Usage Score
5
Efficiency
23.7
Consistency
12.8
Season Value
11.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · UAB
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Broderick Thomas, S. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · UAB. Broderick Thomas shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 23.7 disruption score.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason
UAB paired 6 primary output with 36.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 23.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tulane
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
0.4
Efficiency
23.7
Usage
5
Consistency
12.8
Best Game by takeover score
Middle Tennessee
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 0. Coastal Carolina: 0. Tulane: 1. Charlotte: 0. Louisiana Tech: 0. Rice: 1. North Texas: 0. UTEP: 1. UTSA: 1. Southern Miss: 0. Texas A&M: 1. Middle Tennessee: 0. Middle Tennessee: 0
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 2 by 8.3. Coastal Carolina: 6 by 25. Tulane: 8 by 43.3. Charlotte: 5 by 20.8. Louisiana Tech: 6 by 25. Rice: 2 by 18.3. North Texas: 3 by 12.5. UTEP: 6 by 35. UTSA: 3 by 22.5. Southern Miss: 4 by 16.7. Texas A&M: 6 by 35. Middle Tennessee: 5 by 20.8. Middle Tennessee: 6 by 25
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Tulane
Best efficiency game
43.3 vs Tulane
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/1 | @ Middle Tennessee | W 27-25 | 6 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/24 | @ Middle Tennessee | L 3-27 | 5 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/18 | @ Texas A&M | L 20-41 | 6 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 11/11 | vs Southern Miss | W 26-23 | 4 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/3 | vs UTSA | W 52-3 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/27 | @ UTEP | W 19-0 | 6 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/20 | vs North Texas | W 29-21 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/13 | @ Rice | W 42-0 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/6 | @ Louisiana Tech | W 28-7 | 6 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/29 | vs Charlotte | W 28-7 | 5 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/15 | vs Tulane | W 31-24 | 8 | 8 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/8 | @ Coastal Carolina | L 24-47 | 6 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 8/31 | vs Unknown | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
UAB
2017-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Postseason | UAB | 6 | 36.3 | 8.7 | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | UAB | 6 | 36.3 | 8.7 | 0 |
| 2018 Regular Season | UAB | 5 | 23.7 | 5 | -1 |
#1 Featured game
Southern Miss
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2
Primary metric
2 disruption/tackle impact with 58.2 takeover score.
#2
Tulane
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 51.9 takeover score.
#3
UTEP
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 48.2 takeover score.
#4
Texas A&M
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 46.8 takeover score.
#5
UTSA
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 42.1 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2017 Postseason · UAB
6 primary output · 36.3 efficiency · 8.7 usage
16.4
#2
2017 Regular Season · UAB
16.4
6 primary · 36.3 efficiency · 8.7 usage
#3
2018 Regular Season · UAB
11.8
5 primary · 23.7 efficiency · 5 usage
0
Impact games
1
Splash games
2
10+ tackle games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
152
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 25 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Broderick Thomas quick answers