Usage Score
20.3
Player Dossier
2018-2021East Carolina
Blake Proehl
WR • 6'1" • 186 lbs • Charlotte, NC, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Blake Proehl reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
75.8
Consistency
69
Season Value
66
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · East Carolina
18192021
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- East Carolina
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Tulane
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Blake Proehl, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · East Carolina. Blake Proehl reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season
East Carolina paired 670 primary output with 75.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 75.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2021 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Old Dominion
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 91.7th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Regular Season · East Carolina
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
55.8
Efficiency
75.8
Usage
20.3
Consistency
69
Best Game by takeover score
Tulsa
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. NC State: 45. Unknown: 68. Navy: 19. Unknown: 51. Old Dominion: 100. Temple: 32. UCF: 27. South Florida: 34. Cincinnati: 105. SMU: 51. UConn: 49. Tulsa: 89
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. NC State: 5 by 60. Unknown: 7 by 64.8. Navy: 2 by 63.3. Unknown: 4 by 85. Old Dominion: 2 by 100. Temple: 2 by 100. UCF: 3 by 60. South Florida: 3 by 75.6. Cincinnati: 8 by 87.5. SMU: 4 by 85. UConn: 6 by 54.4. Tulsa: 8 by 74.2
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins74.5 · Games = 2 · +24.3 vs Losses
Losses50.3 · Games = 8 · -24.3 vs Wins
First Half52.5 · Games = 6 · -6.7 vs Second Half
Second Half59.2 · Games = 6 · +6.7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Old Dominion
Best efficiency game
100 vs Temple
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/30 | vs TulsaHigh volume · 2+ TD | L 24-49 | — | 8 | 89 | 11.1 | 11.10 | 2 | 34 |
| Sat 11/23 | @ UConn | W 31-24 | — | 6 | 49 | 8.2 | 8.20 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 11/9 | @ SMU | L 51-59 | — | 4 | 51 | 12.8 | 12.80 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 11/2 | vs Cincinnati100 receiving yards · High volume | L 43-46 | — | 8 | 105 | 13.1 | 13.10 | 0 | 30 |
| Sat 10/26 | vs South Florida | L 20-45 | — | 3 | 34 | 11.3 | 11.30 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/19 | @ UCF | L 28-41 | — | 3 | 27 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 13 |
| Fri 10/4 | vs Temple | L 17-27 | — | 2 | 32 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 9/28 | @ Old Dominion100 receiving yards | W 24-21 | — | 2 | 100 | 50 | 50 | 1 | 72 |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Unknown | — | — | 4 | 51 | 12.8 | 12.80 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 9/14 | @ Navy | L 10-42 | — | 2 | 19 | 9.5 | 9.50 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Unknown | — | — | 7 | 68 | 9.7 | 9.70 | 1 | 20 |
| Sat 8/31 | @ NC State | L 6-34 | — | 5 | 45 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 12 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
East Carolina
2018-2021
Opening stop
Season Progression
2018201920202021
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | East Carolina | 358 | 78.1 | 13.1 | — |
| 2019 Regular Season | East Carolina | 670 | 75.8 | 20.3 | 312 |
| 2020 Regular Season | East Carolina | 577 | 64.8 | 24.4 | -93 |
| 2021 Regular Season | East Carolina | 0 | — | — | -577 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Tulane
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
182
Primary metric
182 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
#2
Old Dominion
100
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
100 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Cincinnati
105
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
105 receiving yards with a 87.5 efficiency score.
#4
Old Dominion
70
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
70 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
SMU
152
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
152 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2019 Regular Season · East Carolina
670 primary output · 75.8 efficiency · 20.3 usage
66
#2
2020 Regular Season · East Carolina
52.5
577 primary · 64.8 efficiency · 24.4 usage
#3
2018 Regular Season · East Carolina
52.2
358 primary · 78.1 efficiency · 13.1 usage
Milestones
4
100+ receiving yards
5
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2017 · Rating 0.7778
Providence · Charlotte, NC
- Committed To
- East Carolina
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2017
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
1,605
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 30 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.