Usage Score
21.8
Player Dossier
2015-2018Utah State
WR • 6'3" • 215 lbs • Belle Glade, FL, USA
Ron'quavion Tarver reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
21.8
Efficiency
66
Consistency
52.7
Season Value
60.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Utah State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Ron'quavion Tarver, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Utah State. Ron'quavion Tarver reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
Utah State paired 709 primary output with 66 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 66 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Air Force
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
54.5
Efficiency
66
Usage
21.8
Consistency
52.7
Best Game by takeover score
North Texas
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. North Texas: 33. Michigan State: 29. New Mexico State: 41. Unknown: 30. Air Force: 128. BYU: 18. UNLV: 52. Wyoming: 7. New Mexico: 112. Hawai'i: 40. San José State: 74. Colorado State: 69. Boise State: 76
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. North Texas: 4 by 55. Michigan State: 3 by 64.4. New Mexico State: 5 by 54.7. Unknown: 5 by 40. Air Force: 9 by 94.8. BYU: 3 by 40. UNLV: 4 by 86.7. Wyoming: 1 by 46.7. New Mexico: 7 by 100. Hawai'i: 5 by 53.3. San José State: 8 by 61.7. Colorado State: 6 by 76.7. Boise State: 6 by 84.4
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Air Force
Best efficiency game
100 vs New Mexico
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/15 | @ North Texas | W 52-13 | — | 4 | 33 | 8.3 | 8.30 | 1 | 13 |
| Sun 11/25 | @ Boise State | L 24-33 | — | 6 | 76 | 12.7 | 12.70 | 1 | 42 |
| Sat 11/17 | @ Colorado State | W 29-24 | — | 6 | 69 | 11.5 | 11.50 | 0 | 28 |
| Sat 11/10 | vs San José StateHigh volume | W 62-24 | — | 8 | 74 | 9.3 | 9.30 | 0 | 15 |
| Sun 11/4 | @ Hawai'i | W 56-17 | — | 5 | 40 | 8 | 8 | 1 | 22 |
| Sat 10/27 | vs New Mexico100 receiving yards | W 61-19 | — | 7 | 112 | 16 | 16 | 1 | 39 |
| Sat 10/20 | @ Wyoming | W 24-16 | — | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 10/13 | vs UNLV2+ TD | W 59-28 | — | 4 | 52 | 13 | 13 | 2 | 29 |
| Sat 10/6 | @ BYU2+ TD | W 45-20 | — | 3 | 18 | 5.5 | 6 | 2 | 8 |
| Sun 9/23 | vs Air Force100 receiving yards · High volume | W 42-32 | — | 9 | 128 | 14.2 | 14.20 | 0 | 29 |
| Fri 9/14 | vs Unknown | — | — | 5 | 30 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 11 |
| Sun 9/9 | vs New Mexico State | W 60-13 | — | 5 | 41 | 8.2 | 8.20 | 0 | 15 |
| Fri 8/31 | @ Michigan State | L 31-38 | — | 3 | 29 | 9.7 | 9.70 | 0 | 10 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Utah State
2015-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Utah State | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Utah State | 602 | 79.6 | 21.9 | 602 |
| 2017 Postseason | Utah State | 569 | 62.5 | 19.1 | -33 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Utah State | 569 | 62.5 | 19.1 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Utah State | 709 | 66 | 21.8 | 140 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Utah State | 709 | 66 | 21.8 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Air Force
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
143
Primary metric
143 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Air Force
128
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
128 receiving yards with a 94.8 efficiency score.
#3
New Mexico State
97
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
97 receiving yards with a 80.8 efficiency score.
#4
Air Force
86
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
86 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
New Mexico
112
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
112 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2018 Postseason · Utah State
709 primary output · 66 efficiency · 21.8 usage
60.1
#2
2018 Regular Season · Utah State
60.1
709 primary · 66 efficiency · 21.8 usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · Utah State
58.6
602 primary · 79.6 efficiency · 21.9 usage
4
100+ receiving yards
5
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2022 · Rating 0.8456
Decatur Central · Indianapolis, IN
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
1,880
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 38 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Ron'quavion Tarver quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit