Usage Score
15.9
Player Dossier
2017-2021Arizona State
DB • 6'0" • 180 lbs • Chandler, AZ, USA
Chase Lucas shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 21.2 disruption score.
Usage Score
15.9
Efficiency
30.7
Consistency
48.9
Season Value
30.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Arizona State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Chase Lucas, DB. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Arizona State. Chase Lucas shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 21.2 disruption score.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
Arizona State paired 15 primary output with 30.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 30.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2021 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UTSA
Win with 5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
1.3
Efficiency
30.7
Usage
15.9
Consistency
48.9
Best Game by takeover score
Fresno State
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Fresno State: 1. UTSA: 5. Michigan State: 0. San Diego State: 0. Washington: 1. Oregon State: 2. Colorado: 0. Stanford: 1. USC: 2. Utah: 0. UCLA: 1. Oregon: 2
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UTSA: 5 by 70.8. Michigan State: 2 by 8.3. San Diego State: 8 by 33.3. Washington: 3 by 22.5. Oregon State: 2 by 28.3. Colorado: 5 by 20.8. Stanford: 6 by 35. USC: 6 by 45. Utah: 3 by 12.5. UCLA: 6 by 35. Oregon: 4 by 36.7
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
UTSA
Best efficiency game
70.8 vs UTSA
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/15 | @ Fresno State | L 20-31 | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | — | — | — |
| Sun 11/18 | @ Oregon | L 29-31 | 4 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/10 | vs UCLA | W 31-28 | 6 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/3 | vs Utah | W 38-20 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/27 | @ USC | W 38-35 | 6 | 4 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 10/19 | vs Stanford | L 13-20 | 6 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/6 | @ Colorado | L 21-28 | 5 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/30 | vs Oregon State | W 52-24 | 2 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 9/23 | @ Washington | L 20-27 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/16 | @ San Diego State | L 21-28 | 8 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/9 | vs Michigan State | W 16-13 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/2 | vs UTSASplash game | W 49-7 | 5 | 5 | — | 3 | 1 | — | 1 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Arizona State
2017-2021
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Postseason | Arizona State | 11 | 29.6 | 5.6 | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | Arizona State | 11 | 29.6 | 5.6 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Arizona State | 15 | 30.7 | 15.9 | 4 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Arizona State | 15 | 30.7 | 15.9 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Arizona State | 9 | 25.9 | 6 | -6 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Arizona State | 9 | 25.9 | 6 | 0 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Arizona State | 5 | 28.1 | 2.3 | -4 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Arizona State | 7 | 21.2 | 3.1 | 2 |
#1 Featured game
UTSA
Win with 5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
5
Primary metric
5 disruption/tackle impact with 60.9 takeover score.
#2
Colorado
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 59.5 takeover score.
#3
Oregon State
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 57.1 takeover score.
#4
USC
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 54 takeover score.
#5
NC State
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 52.4 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2018 Postseason · Arizona State
15 primary output · 30.7 efficiency · 15.9 usage
30.8
#2
2018 Regular Season · Arizona State
30.8
15 primary · 30.7 efficiency · 15.9 usage
#3
2017 Postseason · Arizona State
27.6
11 primary · 29.6 efficiency · 5.6 usage
1
Impact games
2
Splash games
1
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2016 · Rating 0.9143
Chandler · Chandler, AZ
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
211
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 50 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Chase Lucas quick answers
Recruiting profile
4-star recruit