Usage Score
12
Player Dossier
2017-2022Michigan State
Brandon Bouyer-Randle
LB • 6'2" • 240 lbs • Battle Creek, MI, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Brandon Bouyer-Randle shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 41 disruption score.
Efficiency
41
Consistency
58.4
Season Value
31.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Michigan State
17181819202122
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 3
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Michigan State • Texas Tech • UConn
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Michigan
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Brandon Bouyer-Randle, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Michigan State. Brandon Bouyer-Randle shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 41 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season
Michigan State paired 0 primary output with 10.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 41 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2022 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 3 team stops, with role shifts visible across Michigan State, Texas Tech, UConn.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Michigan
Loss with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2022 Regular Season · UConn
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
1.1
Efficiency
41
Usage
12
Consistency
58.4
Best Game by takeover score
Army
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 1. Utah State: 0. Syracuse: 0. Michigan: 3.5. NC State: 1. Fresno State: 1. Florida International: 1. Ball State: 0.5. Boston College: 2. Massachusetts: 1.5. Liberty: 0.5. Army: 1
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 3 by 22.5. Utah State: 8 by 33.3. Syracuse: 8 by 33.3. Michigan: 5 by 55.8. NC State: 9 by 47.5. Fresno State: 7 by 39.2. Florida International: 7 by 39.2. Ball State: 9 by 42.5. Boston College: 5 by 40.8. Massachusetts: 8 by 48.3. Liberty: 6 by 30. Army: 13 by 60
Split Comparison
Wins1.2 · n=5 · +0.2 vs Losses
Losses1 · n=6 · -0.2 vs Wins
First Half1.1 · n=6 · +0 vs Second Half
Second Half1.1 · n=6 · +0 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Michigan
Best efficiency game
60 vs Army
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/19 | @ Army10+ tackles | L 17-34 | 13 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/12 | vs Liberty | W 36-33 | 6 | 3 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 11/4 | vs Massachusetts | W 27-10 | 8 | 3 | — | 1.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/29 | vs Boston College | W 13-3 | 5 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Ball State | L 21-25 | 9 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Florida International | W 33-12 | 7 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/1 | vs Fresno State | W 19-14 | 7 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/24 | @ NC State | L 10-41 | 9 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/17 | @ MichiganSplash game | L 0-59 | 5 | 3 | — | 2.50 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Syracuse | L 14-48 | 8 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Unknown | — | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 8/27 | @ Utah State | L 20-31 | 8 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Michigan State
2017-2019
Opening stop
- 2
Texas Tech
2020-2021
Peak year stop
- 3
UConn
2022
Final stop
Season Progression
2017201820182019202020212022
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Regular Season | Michigan State | 3 | 6.4 | 1.5 | — |
| 2018 Postseason | Michigan State | 9.5 | 16.2 | 5.2 | 6.5 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Michigan State | 9.5 | 16.2 | 5.2 | 0 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Michigan State | 0 | 10.4 | 2 | -9.5 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 6 | 24.2 | 5.3 | 6 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 3 | 17.5 | 4.6 | -3 |
| 2022 Regular Season | UConn | 13 | 41 | 12 | 10 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Michigan
Loss with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3.5
Primary metric
3.5 disruption/tackle impact with 61.5 takeover score.
#2
Maryland
4
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 55.7 takeover score.
#3
Unknown
3
Primary metric
Game with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 51.5 takeover score.
#4
Western Michigan
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 46 takeover score.
#5
Kansas
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 46 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2019 Regular Season · Michigan State
0 primary output · 10.4 efficiency · 2 usage
37.4
#2
2022 Regular Season · UConn
31.5
13 primary · 41 efficiency · 12 usage
#3
2021 Regular Season · Texas Tech
18.9
3 primary · 17.5 efficiency · 4.6 usage
Milestones
1
Impact games
2
Splash games
1
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
3
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
168
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 47 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.