Usage Score
15.3
Player Dossier
2016-2019BYU
Aleva Hifo
WR • 5'10" • 187 lbs • Menifee, CA, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Aleva Hifo reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
64.5
Consistency
47.1
Season Value
53.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · BYU
16161718181919
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- BYU
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: East Carolina
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Aleva Hifo, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · BYU. Aleva Hifo reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason
BYU paired 483 primary output with 64.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 64.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Toledo
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Postseason · BYU
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
40.3
Efficiency
64.5
Usage
15.3
Consistency
47.1
Best Game by takeover score
Hawai'i
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Hawai'i: 44. Utah: 40. Tennessee: 15. USC: 30. Washington: 87. Toledo: 111. South Florida: 20. Boise State: 11. Utah State: 30. Liberty: 62. Massachusetts: 13. San Diego State: 20
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Hawai'i: 5 by 58.7. Utah: 4 by 66.7. Tennessee: 2 by 50. USC: 3 by 66.7. Washington: 6 by 96.7. Toledo: 5 by 100. South Florida: 3 by 44.4. Boise State: 2 by 36.7. Utah State: 3 by 66.7. Liberty: 4 by 100. Massachusetts: 2 by 43.3. San Diego State: 3 by 44.4
Split Comparison
Wins26.8 · n=6 · -26.8 vs Losses
Losses53.7 · n=6 · +26.8 vs Wins
First Half54.5 · n=6 · +28.5 vs Second Half
Second Half26 · n=6 · -28.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Toledo
Best efficiency game
100 vs Liberty
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 12/25 | vs Hawai'i | L 34-38 | — | 5 | 44 | 7 | 8.80 | 0 | 24 |
| Sun 12/1 | @ San Diego State | L 3-13 | — | 3 | 20 | 5.6 | 6.70 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 11/23 | @ Massachusetts | W 56-24 | — | 2 | 13 | 6 | 6.50 | 0 | 7 |
| Sun 11/10 | vs Liberty | W 31-24 | — | 4 | 62 | 11.7 | 15.50 | 1 | 41 |
| Sun 11/3 | @ Utah State | W 42-14 | — | 3 | 30 | 9.7 | 10 | 0 | 15 |
| Sun 10/20 | vs Boise State | W 28-25 | — | 2 | 11 | 5.5 | 5.50 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/12 | @ South Florida | L 23-27 | — | 3 | 20 | 4 | 6.70 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 9/28 | @ Toledo100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | L 21-28 | — | 5 | 111 | 18.8 | 22.20 | 2 | 75 |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Washington | L 19-45 | — | 6 | 87 | 12.9 | 14.50 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 9/14 | vs USC | W 30-27 | — | 3 | 30 | 6.4 | 10 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 9/7 | @ Tennessee | W 29-26 | — | 2 | 15 | 9.3 | 7.50 | 0 | 10 |
| Fri 8/30 | vs Utah | L 12-30 | — | 4 | 40 | 8 | 10 | 0 | 13 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
BYU
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
2016201620172018201820192019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Postseason | BYU | 58 | 29.5 | 9.5 | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | BYU | 58 | 29.5 | 9.5 | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | BYU | 437 | 64.3 | 19.5 | 379 |
| 2018 Postseason | BYU | 358 | 72.1 | 13.2 | -79 |
| 2018 Regular Season | BYU | 358 | 72.1 | 13.2 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | BYU | 483 | 64.5 | 15.3 | 125 |
| 2019 Regular Season | BYU | 483 | 64.5 | 15.3 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
East Carolina
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
148
Primary metric
148 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Toledo
111
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
111 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Western Michigan
85
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
85 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Washington
87
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
87 receiving yards with a 96.7 efficiency score.
#5
Mississippi State
77
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
77 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2019 Postseason · BYU
483 primary output · 64.5 efficiency · 15.3 usage
53.3
#2
2019 Regular Season · BYU
53.3
483 primary · 64.5 efficiency · 15.3 usage
#3
2018 Postseason · BYU
50.8
358 primary · 72.1 efficiency · 13.2 usage
Milestones
2
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,336
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 47 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.