Usage Score
21.5
Player Dossier
2016-2019Florida International
Tony Gaiter IV
WR • 5'9" • 185 lbs • Richmond Heights, FL, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Tony Gaiter IV reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
74.8
Consistency
43.6
Season Value
60
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Florida International
16171718181919
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Florida International
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Massachusetts
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Tony Gaiter IV, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Florida International. Tony Gaiter IV reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason
Florida International paired 622 primary output with 74.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 74.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Massachusetts
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 92.3th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Postseason · Florida International
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
47.8
Efficiency
74.8
Usage
21.5
Consistency
43.6
Best Game by takeover score
Arkansas State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Arkansas State: 15. Tulane: 35. Western Kentucky: 7. Unknown: 17. Louisiana Tech: 87. Massachusetts: 103. Charlotte: 35. UTEP: -2. Middle Tennessee: 30. Old Dominion: 12. Florida Atlantic: 94. Miami: 82. Marshall: 107
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arkansas State: 1 by 100. Tulane: 3 by 77.8. Western Kentucky: 1 by 46.7. Unknown: 1 by 100. Louisiana Tech: 7 by 82.9. Massachusetts: 7 by 98.1. Charlotte: 2 by 100. UTEP: 1 by 0. Middle Tennessee: 3 by 66.7. Old Dominion: 2 by 40. Florida Atlantic: 7 by 89.5. Miami: 6 by 91.1. Marshall: 9 by 79.3
Split Comparison
Wins46 · n=5 · -7.6 vs Losses
Losses53.6 · n=7 · +7.6 vs Wins
First Half42.7 · n=7 · -11.1 vs Second Half
Second Half53.8 · n=6 · +11.1 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Massachusetts
Best efficiency game
100 vs Arkansas State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/21 | @ Arkansas State | L 26-34 | — | 1 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 11/30 | @ Marshall100 receiving yards · High volume | L 27-30 | — | 9 | 107 | 11.9 | 11.90 | 1 | 23 |
| Sun 11/24 | vs Miami | W 30-24 | — | 6 | 82 | 13.7 | 13.70 | 1 | 19 |
| Sat 11/9 | @ Florida Atlantic | L 7-37 | — | 7 | 94 | 13.4 | 13.40 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 11/2 | vs Old Dominion | W 24-17 | — | 2 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 10/26 | @ Middle Tennessee | L 17-50 | — | 3 | 30 | 10 | 10 | 1 | 18 |
| Sat 10/19 | vs UTEP | W 32-17 | — | 1 | -2 | -2 | -2 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 10/12 | vs Charlotte | W 48-23 | — | 2 | 35 | 17.5 | 17.50 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 10/5 | vs Massachusetts100 receiving yards | W 44-0 | — | 7 | 103 | 14.7 | 14.70 | 1 | 30 |
| Sat 9/21 | @ Louisiana Tech | L 31-43 | — | 7 | 87 | 12.4 | 12.40 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Unknown | — | — | 1 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Western Kentucky | L 14-20 | — | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Fri 8/30 | @ Tulane | L 14-42 | — | 3 | 35 | 11.7 | 11.70 | 0 | 15 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Florida International
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
2016201720172018201820192019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Florida International | 101 | 56.9 | 10 | — |
| 2017 Postseason | Florida International | 314 | 58.4 | 15.7 | 213 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Florida International | 314 | 58.4 | 15.7 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Florida International | 227 | 54.7 | 13.2 | -87 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Florida International | 227 | 54.7 | 13.2 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Florida International | 622 | 74.8 | 21.5 | 395 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Florida International | 622 | 74.8 | 21.5 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Massachusetts
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
103
Primary metric
103 receiving yards with a 98.1 efficiency score.
#2
Marshall
107
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
107 receiving yards with a 79.3 efficiency score.
#3
Florida Atlantic
94
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
94 receiving yards with a 89.5 efficiency score.
#4
Indiana
53
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
53 receiving yards with a 88.3 efficiency score.
#5
Unknown
64
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
64 receiving yards with a 85.3 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2019 Postseason · Florida International
622 primary output · 74.8 efficiency · 21.5 usage
60
#2
2019 Regular Season · Florida International
60
622 primary · 74.8 efficiency · 21.5 usage
#3
2017 Postseason · Florida International
46.2
314 primary · 58.4 efficiency · 15.7 usage
Milestones
2
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,264
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 43 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.