Usage Score
12.1
Player Dossier
2017-2021Temple
Anthony Russo
QB • 6'4" • 240 lbs • Doylestown, PA, USA
Balanced quarterback profileVolume operator
Anthony Russo is a balanced quarterback profile with 7.9 usage in the latest tracked season.
Efficiency
58.5
Consistency
78.7
Season Value
61.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Temple
1718181919202121
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Temple • Michigan State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: UCF
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Anthony Russo, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Temple. Anthony Russo is a balanced quarterback profile with 7.9 usage in the latest tracked season.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
Temple paired 2,626 primary output with 58.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 58.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2021 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Temple, Michigan State.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UCF
Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Postseason · Temple
Games
11
Primary Metric / G
238.7
Efficiency
58.5
Usage
12.1
Consistency
78.7
Best Game by takeover score
Duke
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Duke: 240. Buffalo: 24. Maryland: 228. Tulsa: 113. Boston College: 247. East Carolina: 245. Navy: 309. Cincinnati: 246. UCF: 490. Houston: 217. South Florida: 267
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Duke: 53 by 51. Buffalo: 4 by 66.7. Maryland: 25 by 73.3. Tulsa: 21 by 37.9. Boston College: 47 by 43.5. East Carolina: 26 by 63.2. Navy: 36 by 65. Cincinnati: 42 by 64.4. UCF: 64 by 63.4. Houston: 27 by 61.5. South Florida: 43 by 53.8
Split Comparison
Wins232.1 · n=7 · -18.1 vs Losses
Losses250.3 · n=4 · +18.1 vs Wins
First Half182.8 · n=6 · -123.0 vs Second Half
Second Half305.8 · n=5 · +123.0 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
UCF
Best efficiency game
73.3 vs Maryland
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 12/27 | @ Duke | L 27-56 | 25 | 46 | 228 | 54.3 | 1 | 1 | 51 | 7 | 12 | 1.70 | 1 | 15 |
| Sat 11/17 | vs South Florida | W 27-17 | 20 | 34 | 264 | 58.8 | 0 | 1 | 53.8 | 9 | 3 | 0.30 | 0 | 7 |
| Sun 11/11 | @ Houston | W 59-49 | 14 | 22 | 217 | 63.6 | 0 | 0 | 61.5 | 5 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 4 |
| Thu 11/1 | @ UCF300-yard game · 3+ TD | L 40-52 | 31 | 52 | 444 | 59.6 | 4 | 2 | 63.4 | 12 | 46 | 3.80 | 1 | 16 |
| Sat 10/20 | vs Cincinnati3+ TD | W 24-17 | 20 | 41 | 237 | 48.8 | 3 | 3 | 64.4 | 1 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/13 | @ Navy300-yard game | W 24-17 | 23 | 31 | 300 | 74.2 | 1 | 1 | 65 | 5 | 9 | 1.80 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/6 | vs East Carolina3+ TD | W 49-6 | 21 | 25 | 254 | 84.0 | 4 | 1 | 63.2 | 1 | -9 | -9 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 9/29 | @ Boston College | L 35-45 | 20 | 45 | 255 | 44.4 | 0 | 2 | 43.5 | 2 | -8 | -4 | 0 | 0 |
| Thu 9/20 | vs Tulsa | W 31-17 | 7 | 20 | 112 | 35.0 | 0 | 2 | 37.9 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Sat 9/15 | @ Maryland | W 35-14 | 15 | 25 | 228 | 60.0 | 1 | 1 | 73.3 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/8 | vs Buffalo | L 29-36 | 2 | 4 | 24 | 50.0 | 0 | 0 | 66.7 | — | — | — | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Temple
2017-2020
Opening stop
- 2
Michigan State
2021
Final stop
Season Progression
20172018201820192019202020212021
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Regular Season | Temple | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2018 Postseason | Temple | 2,626 | 58.5 | 12.1 | 2,626 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Temple | 2,626 | 58.5 | 12.1 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Temple | 2,797 | 56 | 9.5 | 171 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Temple | 2,797 | 56 | 9.5 | 0 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Temple | 885 | 56.4 | 19.2 | -1,912 |
| 2021 Postseason | Michigan State | 53 | 65.4 | 7.9 | -832 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Michigan State | 53 | 65.4 | 7.9 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UCF
Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
490
Primary metric
490 total offense with 63.4 efficiency.
#2
Memphis
224
Primary metric
Win with 224 yards of offense and 72.4 efficiency.
224 total offense with 72.4 efficiency.
#3
Unknown
419
Primary metric
Game with 419 yards of offense and 69.1 efficiency.
419 total offense with 69.1 efficiency.
#4
Maryland
228
Primary metric
Win with 228 yards of offense and 73.3 efficiency.
228 total offense with 73.3 efficiency.
#5
Tulane
221
Primary metric
Win with 221 yards of offense and 65.3 efficiency.
221 total offense with 65.3 efficiency.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2018 Postseason · Temple
2,626 primary output · 58.5 efficiency · 12.1 usage
61.7
#2
2018 Regular Season · Temple
61.7
2,626 primary · 58.5 efficiency · 12.1 usage
#3
2019 Postseason · Temple
60.9
2,797 primary · 56 efficiency · 9.5 usage
Milestones
8
250+ passing yards
4
300+ total offense
0
3+ takeover TD games
14
Above avg efficiency
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
2
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
6,361
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 30 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.