Usage Score
6
Player Dossier
2017-2020Colorado
Akil Jones
LB • 6'0" • 235 lbs • San Jose, CA, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Akil Jones shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 34.5 disruption score.
Efficiency
22.6
Consistency
12.1
Season Value
12.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Colorado
1718192020
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Colorado
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Utah
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Akil Jones, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Colorado. Akil Jones shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 34.5 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season
Colorado paired 0 primary output with 5.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 22.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2020 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Air Force
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Regular Season · Colorado
Games
11
Havoc Plays / G
0.4
Efficiency
22.6
Usage
6
Consistency
12.1
Best Game by takeover score
Utah
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Nebraska: 1. Air Force: 1. Arizona State: 0. Arizona: 0. Oregon: 1. Washington State: 0. USC: 0. UCLA: 0. Stanford: 0. Washington: 1. Utah: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Nebraska: 4 by 26.7. Air Force: 5 by 30.8. Arizona State: 2 by 8.3. Arizona: 5 by 20.8. Oregon: 4 by 26.7. Washington State: 1 by 4.2. USC: 1 by 4.2. UCLA: 8 by 33.3. Stanford: 4 by 16.7. Washington: 5 by 30.8. Utah: 11 by 45.8
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins0.5 · Games = 4 · +0.2 vs Losses
Losses0.3 · Games = 7 · -0.2 vs Wins
First Half0.5 · Games = 6 · +0.3 vs Second Half
Second Half0.2 · Games = 5 · -0.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Air Force
Best efficiency game
45.8 vs Utah
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 12/1 | @ Utah10+ tackles | L 15-45 | 11 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/24 | vs Washington | W 20-14 | 5 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/9 | vs Stanford | W 16-13 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/3 | @ UCLA | L 14-31 | 8 | 7 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/26 | vs USC | L 31-35 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Washington State | L 10-41 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Oregon | L 3-45 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/5 | vs Arizona | L 30-35 | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/22 | @ Arizona State | W 34-31 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Air Force | L 23-30 | 5 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Nebraska | W 34-31 | 4 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Colorado
2017-2020
Opening stop
Season Progression
20172018201920202020
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Regular Season | Colorado | 0 | 5.6 | 1 | — |
| 2018 Regular Season | Colorado | 0 | 4.2 | 0.7 | 0 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Colorado | 4 | 22.6 | 6 | 4 |
| 2020 Postseason | Colorado | 6 | 34.5 | 10.3 | 2 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Colorado | 6 | 34.5 | 10.3 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Utah
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2
Primary metric
2 disruption/tackle impact with 59.3 takeover score.
#2
UCLA
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 52.7 takeover score.
#3
Air Force
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 50.5 takeover score.
#4
San Diego State
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 46.4 takeover score.
#5
Washington
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 46.3 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2017 Regular Season · Colorado
0 primary output · 5.6 efficiency · 1 usage
35.5
#2
2018 Regular Season · Colorado
35
0 primary · 4.2 efficiency · 0.7 usage
#3
2020 Postseason · Colorado
29
6 primary · 34.5 efficiency · 10.3 usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
2
Splash games
2
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2023 · Rating 0.8378
Northwestern · Miami, FL
- Committed To
- Western Kentucky
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2023
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
83
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 22 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.