Usage Score
8.9
Player Dossier
2015-2018Colorado
Kabion Ento
WR • 6'3" • 190 lbs • Pine Bluff, AR, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Kabion Ento reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
70.6
Consistency
29.9
Season Value
49.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Colorado
15161718
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Colorado
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Arizona
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Kabion Ento, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Colorado. Kabion Ento reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
Colorado paired 174 primary output with 88.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 70.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2018 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Arizona
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Regular Season · Colorado
Games
8
Receiving Yards / G
20.1
Efficiency
70.6
Usage
8.9
Consistency
29.9
Best Game by takeover score
California
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Nebraska: 0. Unknown: 3. UCLA: 11. USC: 0. Arizona: 82. Washington State: 29. Utah: 10. California: 26
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 1 by 20. UCLA: 1 by 73.3. Arizona: 5 by 100. Washington State: 2 by 96.7. Utah: 2 by 33.3. California: 1 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins5.5 · n=2 · -23.9 vs Losses
Losses29.4 · n=5 · +23.9 vs Wins
First Half3.5 · n=4 · -33.3 vs Second Half
Second Half36.8 · n=4 · +33.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
8 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Arizona
Best efficiency game
100 vs California
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Colorado
2015-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
2015201620172018
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Colorado | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Colorado | 174 | 88.7 | 6.9 | 174 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Colorado | 0 | — | — | -174 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Colorado | 161 | 70.6 | 8.9 | 161 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Arizona
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
82
Primary metric
82 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Unknown
88
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
88 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Utah
38
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
38 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Washington State
29
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
29 receiving yards with a 96.7 efficiency score.
#5
California
26
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
26 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Regular Season · Colorado
174 primary output · 88.7 efficiency · 6.9 usage
56.5
#2
2018 Regular Season · Colorado
49.9
161 primary · 70.6 efficiency · 8.9 usage
#3
2015 Regular Season · Colorado
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
335
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 14 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.