Usage Score
8.3
Player Dossier
2016-2019Louisiana
Jacques Boudreaux
LB • 6'1" • 229 lbs • New Orleans, LA, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Jacques Boudreaux shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 35.1 disruption score.
Efficiency
35.2
Consistency
23
Season Value
19.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Louisiana
161718181919
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Louisiana
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: UL Monroe
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jacques Boudreaux, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Louisiana. Jacques Boudreaux shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 35.1 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
Louisiana paired 0 primary output with 5.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 35.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Game with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Postseason · Louisiana
Games
14
Havoc Plays / G
0.8
Efficiency
35.2
Usage
8.3
Consistency
23
Best Game by takeover score
Tulane
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011121314
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Tulane: 1. Unknown: 3. Mississippi State: 0.5. Coastal Carolina: 0. Alabama: 0. Texas State: 2. New Mexico State: 0. App State: 0.5. Arkansas State: 0. Troy: 1.5. Georgia State: 0. South Alabama: 0. UL Monroe: 2. App State: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Tulane: 6 by 35. Unknown: 4 by 46.7. Mississippi State: 7 by 34.2. Coastal Carolina: 6 by 25. Alabama: 7 by 29.2. Texas State: 6 by 45. New Mexico State: 4 by 16.7. App State: 6 by 30. Arkansas State: 7 by 29.2. Troy: 7 by 44.2. Georgia State: 9 by 37.5. South Alabama: 9 by 37.5. UL Monroe: 11 by 65.8. App State: 4 by 16.7
Split Comparison
Wins0.7 · n=6 · +0.2 vs Losses
Losses0.5 · n=7 · -0.2 vs Wins
First Half0.9 · n=7 · +0.4 vs Second Half
Second Half0.6 · n=7 · -0.4 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Unknown
Best efficiency game
65.8 vs UL Monroe
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/15 | vs Tulane | L 24-41 | 6 | 5 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 12/1 | @ App State | L 19-30 | 4 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/24 | @ UL Monroe10+ tackles | W 31-28 | 11 | 4 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/17 | vs South Alabama | W 48-38 | 9 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/10 | vs Georgia State | W 36-22 | 9 | 7 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/3 | @ Troy | L 16-26 | 7 | 4 | — | 1.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/27 | vs Arkansas State | W 47-43 | 7 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/20 | @ App State | L 17-27 | 6 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/13 | vs New Mexico State | W 66-38 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/6 | @ Texas State | W 42-27 | 6 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 9/29 | @ Alabama | L 14-56 | 7 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/22 | vs Coastal Carolina | L 28-30 | 6 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/15 | @ Mississippi State | L 10-56 | 7 | 3 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/1 | vs Unknown | — | 4 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Louisiana
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
201620172018201820192019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Louisiana | 0 | 5.6 | 1.1 | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | Louisiana | 4.5 | 28.7 | 8.1 | 4.5 |
| 2018 Postseason | Louisiana | 10.5 | 35.2 | 8.3 | 6 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Louisiana | 10.5 | 35.2 | 8.3 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Louisiana | 6.5 | 35.1 | 6.6 | -4 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Louisiana | 6.5 | 35.1 | 6.6 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UL Monroe
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2
Primary metric
2 disruption/tackle impact with 62.3 takeover score.
#2
New Mexico State
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 60.4 takeover score.
#3
Unknown
3
Primary metric
Game with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 53.4 takeover score.
#4
UL Monroe
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 50.9 takeover score.
#5
App State
1.5
Primary metric
Loss with 1.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1.5 disruption/tackle impact with 47.2 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Regular Season · Louisiana
0 primary output · 5.6 efficiency · 1.1 usage
35.5
#2
2018 Postseason · Louisiana
19.5
10.5 primary · 35.2 efficiency · 8.3 usage
#3
2018 Regular Season · Louisiana
19.5
10.5 primary · 35.2 efficiency · 8.3 usage
Milestones
2
Impact games
1
Splash games
6
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2016 · Rating 0.7859
Holy Cross · New Orleans, LA
- Committed To
- Louisiana
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2016
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
250
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 40 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.