Usage Score
8.8
Player Dossier
2015-2018UTSA
Les Maruo
LB • 6'0" • 225 lbs • Wichita, KS, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Les Maruo shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 36.9 disruption score.
Efficiency
36.9
Consistency
37.4
Season Value
23.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · UTSA
15161718
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- UTSA
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Southern Miss
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Les Maruo, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · UTSA. Les Maruo shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 36.9 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season
UTSA paired 8.5 primary output with 36.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 36.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2018 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Southern Miss
Loss with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Regular Season · UTSA
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
0.7
Efficiency
36.9
Usage
8.8
Consistency
37.4
Best Game by takeover score
North Texas
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Arizona State: 0. Baylor: 1. Kansas State: 1. Texas State: 1. UTEP: 0.5. Rice: 2. Louisiana Tech: 0. Southern Miss: 2.5. UAB: 0. Florida International: 0.5. Marshall: 0. North Texas: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arizona State: 3 by 12.5. Baylor: 5 by 30.8. Kansas State: 6 by 35. Texas State: 4 by 26.7. UTEP: 8 by 38.3. Rice: 8 by 53.3. Louisiana Tech: 8 by 33.3. Southern Miss: 12 by 75. UAB: 9 by 37.5. Florida International: 12 by 55. Marshall: 8 by 33.3. North Texas: 3 by 12.5
Split Comparison
Wins1.2 · n=3 · +0.6 vs Losses
Losses0.6 · n=9 · -0.6 vs Wins
First Half0.9 · n=6 · +0.4 vs Second Half
Second Half0.5 · n=6 · -0.4 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Southern Miss
Best efficiency game
75 vs Southern Miss
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 11/25 | vs North Texas | L 21-24 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/17 | @ Marshall | L 0-23 | 8 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/11 | vs Florida International10+ tackles | L 7-45 | 12 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/3 | @ UAB | L 3-52 | 9 | 7 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/20 | @ Southern Miss10+ tackles | L 17-27 | 12 | 8 | — | 1.50 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/13 | vs Louisiana Tech | L 3-31 | 8 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/6 | @ Rice | W 20-3 | 8 | 6 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/29 | vs UTEP | W 30-21 | 8 | 6 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/22 | vs Texas State | W 25-21 | 4 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/15 | @ Kansas State | L 17-41 | 6 | 5 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/8 | vs Baylor | L 20-37 | 5 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 9/2 | @ Arizona State | L 7-49 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UTSA
2015-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
2015201620172018
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | UTSA | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | UTSA | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | UTSA | 3 | 16 | 4.7 | 3 |
| 2018 Regular Season | UTSA | 8.5 | 36.9 | 8.8 | 5.5 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Southern Miss
Loss with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5
Primary metric
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 67.5 takeover score.
#2
Unknown
3
Primary metric
Game with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 57.9 takeover score.
#3
Rice
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 49.6 takeover score.
#4
Florida International
0.5
Primary metric
Loss with 0.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0.5 disruption/tackle impact with 28.6 takeover score.
#5
Kansas State
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 28.1 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2018 Regular Season · UTSA
8.5 primary output · 36.9 efficiency · 8.8 usage
23.2
#2
2017 Regular Season · UTSA
7.7
3 primary · 16 efficiency · 4.7 usage
#3
2015 Regular Season · UTSA
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
1
Impact games
0
Splash games
2
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
98
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 17 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.