Usage Score
26.6
Player Dossier
2016-2019Tulane
Darnell Mooney
WR • 5'11" • 175 lbs • Gadsden, AL, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Darnell Mooney reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
92.4
Consistency
37.1
Season Value
54
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Tulane
161718181919
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Tulane
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: East Carolina
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Darnell Mooney, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Tulane. Darnell Mooney reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
Tulane paired 993 primary output with 84.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 92.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: SMU
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2017 Regular Season · Tulane
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
54.5
Efficiency
92.4
Usage
26.6
Consistency
37.1
Best Game by takeover score
SMU
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 29. Navy: 24. Oklahoma: 11. Army: 26. Florida International: 0. South Florida: 61. Memphis: 70. Cincinnati: 115. East Carolina: 67. Houston: 28. SMU: 168
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 2 by 96.7. Navy: 1 by 100. Oklahoma: 1 by 73.3. Army: 2 by 86.7. South Florida: 3 by 100. Memphis: 4 by 100. Cincinnati: 7 by 100. East Carolina: 6 by 74.4. Houston: 2 by 93.3. SMU: 6 by 100
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins40.3 · Games = 3 · -23.8 vs Losses
Losses64.1 · Games = 7 · +23.8 vs Wins
First Half25.2 · Games = 6 · -64.4 vs Second Half
Second Half89.6 · Games = 5 · +64.4 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
SMU
Best efficiency game
100 vs SMU
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/25 | @ SMU100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | L 38-41 | — | 6 | 168 | 28 | 28 | 2 | 52 |
| Sat 11/18 | vs Houston | W 20-17 | — | 2 | 28 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 17 |
| Sun 11/12 | @ East Carolina | W 31-24 | — | 6 | 67 | 11.2 | 11.20 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 11/4 | vs Cincinnati100 receiving yards | L 16-17 | — | 7 | 115 | 16.4 | 16.40 | 0 | 32 |
| Sat 10/28 | @ Memphis | L 26-56 | — | 4 | 70 | 17.5 | 17.50 | 1 | 41 |
| Sat 10/21 | vs South Florida | L 28-34 | — | 3 | 61 | 20.3 | 20.30 | 0 | 36 |
| Sat 10/14 | @ Florida International | L 10-23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/23 | vs Army | W 21-17 | — | 2 | 26 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 9/16 | @ Oklahoma | L 14-56 | — | 1 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 9/9 | @ Navy | L 21-23 | — | 1 | 24 | 24 | 24 | 0 | 24 |
| Sun 9/3 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 29 | 14.5 | 14.50 | 1 | 19 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Tulane
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
201620172018201820192019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Tulane | 267 | 72.7 | 27.1 | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | Tulane | 599 | 92.4 | 26.6 | 332 |
| 2018 Postseason | Tulane | 993 | 84.5 | 31.5 | 394 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Tulane | 993 | 84.5 | 31.5 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Tulane | 713 | 86.7 | 24.2 | -280 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Tulane | 713 | 86.7 | 24.2 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
East Carolina
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
217
Primary metric
217 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
SMU
168
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
168 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Navy
112
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
112 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
UAB
123
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
123 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Cincinnati
115
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
115 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2018 Postseason · Tulane
993 primary output · 84.5 efficiency · 31.5 usage
69
#2
2018 Regular Season · Tulane
69
993 primary · 84.5 efficiency · 31.5 usage
#3
2019 Postseason · Tulane
62.7
713 primary · 86.7 efficiency · 24.2 usage
Milestones
7
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2016 · Rating 0.7883
Gaston Sch · Gadsden, AL
- Committed To
- Tulane
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2016
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
2,572
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 46 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.