Usage Score
9.3
Player Dossier
2016-2019Tulane
Darius Bradwell
RB • 6'1" • 230 lbs • Tallahassee, FL, USA
Balanced backfield optionSteady chain mover
Darius Bradwell leans balanced backfield option traits and 48 efficiency.
Efficiency
59
Consistency
42.2
Season Value
38.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Tulane
161718181919
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Tulane
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: South Florida
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Darius Bradwell, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Tulane. Darius Bradwell leans balanced backfield option traits and 48 efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
Tulane paired 1,145 primary output with 60.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 59 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tulsa
Win with 102 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2017 Regular Season · Tulane
Games
12
Scrimmage Yards / G
36.8
Efficiency
59
Usage
9.3
Consistency
42.2
Best Game by takeover score
SMU
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 58. Navy: 21. Oklahoma: 42. Army: 2. Tulsa: 102. Florida International: 29. South Florida: 24. Memphis: 27. Cincinnati: 14. East Carolina: 24. Houston: 19. SMU: 80
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 6 by 90.3. Navy: 8 by 27.3. Oklahoma: 8 by 59.4. Army: 2 by 10.4. Tulsa: 12 by 79.8. Florida International: 1 by 100. South Florida: 6 by 41.7. Memphis: 5 by 56.3. Cincinnati: 3 by 48.6. East Carolina: 6 by 41.7. Houston: 3 by 66. SMU: 9 by 87
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins36.8 · Games = 4 · +2.9 vs Losses
Losses33.9 · Games = 7 · -2.9 vs Wins
First Half42.3 · Games = 6 · +11.0 vs Second Half
Second Half31.3 · Games = 6 · -11.0 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Tulsa
Best efficiency game
100 vs Florida International
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/25 | @ SMU2+ TD | L 38-41 | 9 | 80 | 8.90 | 2 | — | — | 8.9 |
| Sat 11/18 | vs Houston | W 20-17 | 3 | 19 | 6.30 | 0 | — | — | 6.3 |
| Sun 11/12 | @ East Carolina | W 31-24 | 6 | 24 | 4 | 0 | — | — | 4 |
| Sat 11/4 | vs Cincinnati | L 16-17 | 3 | 14 | 4.70 | 0 | — | — | 4.7 |
| Sat 10/28 | @ Memphis | L 26-56 | 5 | 27 | 5.40 | 0 | — | — | 5.4 |
| Sat 10/21 | vs South Florida | L 28-34 | 6 | 24 | 4 | 0 | — | — | 4 |
| Sat 10/14 | @ Florida International | L 10-23 | 1 | 29 | 29 | 0 | — | — | 29 |
| Sat 10/7 | vs Tulsa | W 62-28 | 10 | 71 | 7.10 | 1 | 2 | 31 | 8.5 |
| Sat 9/23 | vs Army | W 21-17 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | — | — | 1 |
| Sat 9/16 | @ Oklahoma | L 14-56 | 7 | 42 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5.3 |
| Sat 9/9 | @ Navy | L 21-23 | 8 | 21 | 2.60 | 0 | — | — | 2.6 |
| Sun 9/3 | vs Unknown | — | 6 | 58 | 9.70 | 1 | — | — | 9.7 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Tulane
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
201620172018201820192019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Tulane | 33 | 32.1 | 6 | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | Tulane | 442 | 59 | 9.3 | 409 |
| 2018 Postseason | Tulane | 1,145 | 60.3 | 26.7 | 703 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Tulane | 1,145 | 60.3 | 26.7 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Tulane | 497 | 48 | 19.3 | -648 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Tulane | 497 | 48 | 19.3 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
South Florida
Win with 135 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
135
Primary metric
135 scrimmage yards and 26.8 usage.
#2
Memphis
143
Primary metric
Win with 143 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
143 scrimmage yards and 27.5 usage.
#3
Tulsa
102
Primary metric
Win with 102 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
102 scrimmage yards and 15.2 usage.
#4
Houston
113
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
113 scrimmage yards and 35.1 usage.
#5
Louisiana
150
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
150 scrimmage yards and 44.3 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2018 Postseason · Tulane
1,145 primary output · 60.3 efficiency · 26.7 usage
67
#2
2018 Regular Season · Tulane
67
1,145 primary · 60.3 efficiency · 26.7 usage
#3
2019 Postseason · Tulane
41.1
497 primary · 48 efficiency · 19.3 usage
Milestones
5
100+ rush yards
1
150+ scrimmage yards
3
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2016 · Rating 0.7981
Amos P. Godby · Tallahassee, FL
- Committed To
- Tulane
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2016
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
2,117
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 38 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.