Usage Score
7.6
Player Dossier
2016-2019Ohio State
Binjimen Victor
WR • 6'4" • 199 lbs • Pompano Beach, FL, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Binjimen Victor reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
91.7
Consistency
79.9
Season Value
61.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Ohio State
16161718181919
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Ohio State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Michigan State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Binjimen Victor, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Ohio State. Binjimen Victor reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason
Ohio State paired 573 primary output with 88.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 91.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Purdue
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Postseason · Ohio State
Games
9
Receiving Yards / G
39.3
Efficiency
91.7
Usage
7.6
Consistency
79.9
Best Game by takeover score
Washington
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Washington: 34. Rutgers: 31. Tulane: 40. Penn State: 55. Indiana: 43. Purdue: 67. Nebraska: 10. Maryland: 41. Northwestern: 33
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Washington: 2 by 100. Rutgers: 3 by 68.9. Tulane: 2 by 100. Penn State: 2 by 100. Indiana: 2 by 100. Purdue: 5 by 89.3. Nebraska: 1 by 66.7. Maryland: 2 by 100. Northwestern: 2 by 100
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins35.9 · Games = 8
First Half40.6 · Games = 5 · +2.9 vs Second Half
Second Half37.8 · Games = 4 · -2.9 vs First Half
All Games39.3 · Games = 9
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Purdue
Best efficiency game
100 vs Washington
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 1/1 | vs Washington | W 28-23 | — | 2 | 34 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 24 |
| Sun 12/2 | vs Northwestern | W 45-24 | — | 2 | 33 | 16.5 | 16.50 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 11/17 | @ Maryland | W 52-51 | — | 2 | 41 | 20.5 | 20.50 | 1 | 38 |
| Sat 11/3 | vs Nebraska | W 36-31 | — | 1 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 10/20 | @ Purdue | L 20-49 | — | 5 | 67 | 13.4 | 13.40 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 10/6 | vs Indiana | W 49-26 | — | 2 | 43 | 21.5 | 21.50 | 1 | 30 |
| Sat 9/29 | @ Penn State | W 27-26 | — | 2 | 55 | 27.5 | 27.50 | 1 | 47 |
| Sat 9/22 | vs Tulane | W 49-6 | — | 2 | 40 | 20 | 20 | 1 | 31 |
| Sat 9/8 | vs Rutgers | W 52-3 | — | 3 | 31 | 10.3 | 10.30 | 0 | 15 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Ohio State
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
2016201620172018201820192019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Postseason | Ohio State | 64 | 82.2 | 5.9 | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Ohio State | 64 | 82.2 | 5.9 | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Ohio State | 349 | 78 | 11.6 | 285 |
| 2018 Postseason | Ohio State | 354 | 91.7 | 7.6 | 5 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Ohio State | 354 | 91.7 | 7.6 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Ohio State | 573 | 88.1 | 14.4 | 219 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Ohio State | 573 | 88.1 | 14.4 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Michigan State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
79
Primary metric
79 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Rutgers
69
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
69 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Maryland
36
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
36 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Michigan State
65
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
65 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Indiana
66
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
66 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2019 Postseason · Ohio State
573 primary output · 88.1 efficiency · 14.4 usage
68.4
#2
2019 Regular Season · Ohio State
68.4
573 primary · 88.1 efficiency · 14.4 usage
#3
2018 Postseason · Ohio State
61.1
354 primary · 91.7 efficiency · 7.6 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2016 · Rating 0.9546
Coconut Creek · Fort Lauderdale, FL
- Committed To
- Ohio State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2016
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,340
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 33 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.