Usage Score
10.2
Player Dossier
2016-2019Ohio State
LB • 6'3" • 240 lbs • Columbus, OH, USA
Malik Harrison shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 40.2 disruption score.
Usage Score
10.2
Efficiency
40.2
Consistency
63.7
Season Value
36.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Ohio State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Malik Harrison, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason · Ohio State. Malik Harrison shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 40.2 disruption score.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason
Ohio State paired 25 primary output with 40.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 40.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Maryland
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
14
Havoc Plays / G
1.8
Efficiency
40.2
Usage
10.2
Consistency
63.7
Best Game by takeover score
Clemson
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Clemson: 0.5. Florida Atlantic: 3. Cincinnati: 3. Indiana: 2.5. Miami (OH): 1. Nebraska: 2. Michigan State: 1. Northwestern: 0.5. Wisconsin: 0. Maryland: 4. Rutgers: 3. Penn State: 2. Michigan: 1.5. Wisconsin: 1
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Clemson: 6 by 30. Florida Atlantic: 5 by 50.8. Cincinnati: 5 by 50.8. Indiana: 4 by 41.7. Miami (OH): 4 by 26.7. Nebraska: 7 by 49.2. Michigan State: 3 by 22.5. Northwestern: 9 by 42.5. Wisconsin: 4 by 16.7. Maryland: 5 by 60.8. Rutgers: 6 by 55. Penn State: 9 by 57.5. Michigan: 2 by 23.3. Wisconsin: 6 by 35
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Maryland
Best efficiency game
60.8 vs Maryland
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 12/29 | vs Clemson | L 23-29 | 6 | 5 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 12/8 | @ Wisconsin | W 34-21 | 6 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/30 | @ Michigan | W 56-27 | 2 | 1 | — | 1.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/23 | vs Penn StateSplash game | W 28-17 | 9 | 4 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/16 | @ RutgersSplash game | W 56-21 | 6 | 5 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/9 | vs Maryland | W 73-14 | 5 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Wisconsin | W 38-7 | 4 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Northwestern | W 52-3 | 9 | 7 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/5 | vs Michigan State | W 34-10 | 3 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/28 | @ Nebraska | W 48-7 | 7 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Miami (OH) | W 76-5 | 4 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/14 | @ Indiana | W 51-10 | 4 | 3 | — | 1.50 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/7 | vs CincinnatiSplash game | W 42-0 | 5 | 2 | — | 2.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Florida AtlanticSplash game | W 45-21 | 5 | 3 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Ohio State
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Ohio State | 2 | 14.9 | 3.2 | — |
| 2017 Postseason | Ohio State | 6 | 17.8 | 3.6 | 4 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Ohio State | 6 | 17.8 | 3.6 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Ohio State | 16 | 41.1 | 12.1 | 10 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Ohio State | 16 | 41.1 | 12.1 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Ohio State | 25 | 40.2 | 10.2 | 9 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Ohio State | 25 | 40.2 | 10.2 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Purdue
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3
Primary metric
3 disruption/tackle impact with 65.9 takeover score.
#2
Michigan
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 60.9 takeover score.
#3
Maryland
4
Primary metric
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 57 takeover score.
#4
Michigan State
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 55.4 takeover score.
#5
Michigan State
2.5
Primary metric
Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 48.9 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2019 Postseason · Ohio State
25 primary output · 40.2 efficiency · 10.2 usage
36.9
#2
2019 Regular Season · Ohio State
36.9
25 primary · 40.2 efficiency · 10.2 usage
#3
2018 Postseason · Ohio State
30.1
16 primary · 41.1 efficiency · 12.1 usage
2
Impact games
7
Splash games
3
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2023 · Rating 0.8558
Brother Rice · Bloomfield Hills, MI
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
206
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 43 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Malik Harrison quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit