Usage Score
6.7
Player Dossier
2016-2017UTEP
Dante Lovilotte
LB • 5'11" • 230 lbs • Port Arthur, TX, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Dante Lovilotte shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 28.2 disruption score.
Efficiency
28.2
Consistency
11.1
Season Value
13
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · UTEP
1617
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 2
- Program Path
- UTEP
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: UTSA
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Dante Lovilotte, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · UTEP. Dante Lovilotte shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 28.2 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
UTEP paired 10 primary output with 38.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 28.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2017 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: North Texas
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2017 Regular Season · UTEP
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
0.5
Efficiency
28.2
Usage
6.7
Consistency
11.1
Best Game by takeover score
UAB
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Oklahoma: 2. Rice: 0. Arizona: 0. New Mexico State: 1. Army: 0. Western Kentucky: 0. Southern Miss: 0. UTSA: 0.5. Middle Tennessee: 0. North Texas: 2. Louisiana Tech: 0. UAB: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oklahoma: 3 by 32.5. Rice: 11 by 45.8. Arizona: 7 by 29.2. New Mexico State: 8 by 43.3. Army: 4 by 16.7. Western Kentucky: 1 by 4.2. Southern Miss: 6 by 25. UTSA: 2 by 13.3. Middle Tennessee: 7 by 29.2. North Texas: 6 by 45. Louisiana Tech: 8 by 33.3. UAB: 5 by 20.8
Split Comparison
Losses0.5 · n=12
First Half0.5 · n=6 · +0.1 vs Second Half
Second Half0.4 · n=6 · -0.1 vs First Half
All Games0.5 · n=12
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
North Texas
Best efficiency game
45.8 vs Rice
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/25 | @ UAB | L 7-28 | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/18 | vs Louisiana Tech | L 21-42 | 8 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/11 | @ North Texas | L 10-45 | 6 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/4 | @ Middle Tennessee | L 3-30 | 7 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/29 | vs UTSA | L 14-31 | 2 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/14 | @ Southern Miss | L 0-24 | 6 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/8 | vs Western Kentucky | L 14-15 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/30 | @ Army | L 21-35 | 4 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/24 | @ New Mexico State | L 14-41 | 8 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/16 | vs Arizona | L 16-63 | 7 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/10 | vs Rice10+ tackles | L 14-31 | 11 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/2 | @ Oklahoma | L 7-56 | 3 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UTEP
2016-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
20162017
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | UTEP | 10 | 38.9 | 10.2 | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | UTEP | 5.5 | 28.2 | 6.7 | -4.5 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UTSA
Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5
Primary metric
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 55.1 takeover score.
#2
North Texas
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 53.8 takeover score.
#3
Oklahoma
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 50.3 takeover score.
#4
Old Dominion
1.5
Primary metric
Loss with 1.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1.5 disruption/tackle impact with 46.8 takeover score.
#5
New Mexico State
1.5
Primary metric
Win with 1.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1.5 disruption/tackle impact with 35.8 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Regular Season · UTEP
10 primary output · 38.9 efficiency · 10.2 usage
29.2
#2
2017 Regular Season · UTEP
13
5.5 primary · 28.2 efficiency · 6.7 usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
4
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
156
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 24 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.