Usage Score
0.9
Player Dossier
2014-2019UTEP
Christian Buckingham
DL • 6'4" • 280 lbs • Tafuna, American Samoa
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Christian Buckingham shows a ball-hunting defender profile with partial disruption data.
Efficiency
5.6
Consistency
100
Season Value
35.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · UTEP
141516171819
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- UTEP
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Army
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Christian Buckingham, DL. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · UTEP. Christian Buckingham shows a ball-hunting defender profile with partial disruption data.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season
UTEP paired 0 primary output with 5.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 5.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Army
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2017 Regular Season · UTEP
Games
3
Havoc Plays / G
0
Efficiency
5.6
Usage
0.9
Consistency
100
Best Game by takeover score
Army
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Oklahoma: 0. New Mexico State: 0. Army: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oklahoma: 1 by 4.2. New Mexico State: 0 by 0. Army: 3 by 12.5
Split Comparison
Losses0 · n=3
First Half0 · n=2
All Games0 · n=3
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
3 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Army
Best efficiency game
12.5 vs Army
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UTEP
2014-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
201420152016201720182019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | 5.6 | 0.9 | 0 |
| 2018 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2019 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | — | — | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Army
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0
Primary metric
0 disruption/tackle impact with 4.9 takeover score.
#2
Oklahoma
0
Primary metric
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 1.6 takeover score.
#3
New Mexico State
0
Primary metric
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 0 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2017 Regular Season · UTEP
0 primary output · 5.6 efficiency · 0.9 usage
35.5
#2
2014 Regular Season · UTEP
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2015 Regular Season · UTEP
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
4
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 3 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.