Usage / Role
42%
Rotational defensive role
Player Dossier
2016-2021UTSA
S • 5'9" • 190 lbs • New Orleans, LA, USA
Antonio Parks shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 21.1 disruption score.
Usage / Role
42%
Rotational defensive role
Impact Production
42
Developing production for a safety
Reliability
70
Reliable weekly contributor
Star Power
38
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2020 Postseason · UTSA
Snapshot
Player Story
Antonio Parks built his college career from 2016 through 2021 as a safety from New Orleans, LA wearing No. 12, spending time with Arizona and UTSA. The clearest part of Antonio Parks' career was his defensive...
Read the storyAntonio Parks, S. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2020 Postseason · UTSA. Antonio Parks shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 21.1 disruption score.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Tackles | TFL | Sacks | QB Hur | PD | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Arizona | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | - |
| 2017 Regular Season | Arizona | 6 | 7 | - | 0 | - | 1 | 0 | 7.8 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Arizona | 2 | 1 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | 34.9 |
| 2019 Regular Season | UTSA | 4 | 10 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | 42.1 |
| 2020 Postseason | UTSA | 12 | 8 | - | 0 | 1 | - | 0 | 58.9 |
| 2020 Regular Season | UTSA | 12 | 42 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 58.9 |
| 2021 Postseason | UTSA | 13 | 6 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | 36.7 |
| 2021 Regular Season | UTSA | 13 | 43 | 1 | 0 | - | 4 | 0 | 36.7 |
Related Context
Antonio Parks played S for Arizona and UTSA. Across 6 tracked seasons, Antonio Parks recorded 117 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2021 with UTSA.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason
UTSA paired 9 primary output with 24.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2021 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 21.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2021 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Arizona, UTSA.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UTEP
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
0.5
Efficiency
21.1
Usage
3.9
Consistency
15.4
Best Game by takeover score
UTEP
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. San Diego State: 0. Illinois: 0. Middle Tennessee: 1. Memphis: 1. UNLV: 0. Western Kentucky: 0. Rice: 0. Louisiana Tech: 1. UTEP: 2. Southern Miss: 1. UAB: 0. North Texas: 0. Western Kentucky: 1
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. San Diego State: 6 by 25. Illinois: 5 by 20.8. Middle Tennessee: 2 by 18.3. Memphis: 1 by 14.2. UNLV: 6 by 25. Western Kentucky: 7 by 29.2. Rice: 1 by 4.2. Louisiana Tech: 3 by 22.5. UTEP: 3 by 32.5. Southern Miss: 2 by 18.3. UAB: 3 by 12.5. North Texas: 6 by 25. Western Kentucky: 4 by 26.7
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
UTEP
Best efficiency game
32.5 vs UTEP
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 12/22 | @ San Diego State | L 24-38 | 6 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 12/4 | vs Western Kentucky | W 49-41 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/27 | @ North Texas | L 23-45 | 6 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/20 | vs UAB | W 34-31 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/13 | vs Southern Miss | W 27-17 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/7 | @ UTEPSplash game | W 44-23 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 10/23 | @ Louisiana Tech | W 45-16 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/16 | vs Rice | W 45-0 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/9 | @ Western Kentucky | W 52-46 | 7 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/2 | vs UNLV | W 24-17 | 6 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/25 | @ Memphis | W 31-28 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/18 | vs Middle Tennessee | W 27-13 | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/4 | @ Illinois | W 37-30 | 5 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Player Story
Antonio Parks built his college career from 2016 through 2021 as a safety from New Orleans, LA wearing No. 12, spending time with Arizona and UTSA. The clearest part of Antonio Parks' career was his defensive production: 117 tackles, 5 tackles for loss, 3 interceptions, and 7 passes defended across 37 career games in the available record. His largest box-score season came in 2021 with UTSA. Those numbers show where he fit, how often the ball or action found him, and how his role developed over time.
Defensive careers can be hard to read from one number, but Antonio Parks' production has multiple signals. With 37 career games in the available record, his career has enough shape to show both opportunity and production across Arizona and UTSA.
The arc is straightforward: Antonio Parks moved through the depth chart, found a larger role, and turned that opportunity into production that can be understood through standard football numbers.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Arizona
2016-2018
Opening stop
UTSA
2019-2021
Final stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Arizona | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | Arizona | 1 | 6.6 | 1 | 1 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Arizona | 0 | 2.1 | 0.3 | -1 |
| 2019 Regular Season | UTSA | 0 | 10.4 | 1.9 | 0 |
| 2020 Postseason | UTSA | 9 | 24.9 | 6.8 | 9 |
| 2020 Regular Season | UTSA | 9 | 24.9 | 6.8 | 0 |
| 2021 Postseason | UTSA | 7 | 21.1 | 3.9 | -2 |
| 2021 Regular Season | UTSA | 7 | 21.1 | 3.9 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
@ UAB
Week 5 · L 13-21 · Conference game
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2
Havoc Plays
80.3 takeover
2 disruption/tackle impact with 80.3 takeover score.
#2
vs Army
Week 7 · L 16-28
2
Havoc Plays
69.7 takeover
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 69.7 takeover score.
#3
vs Louisiana
Week 1 · L 24-31 · Postseason
1
Havoc Plays
64.4 takeover
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 64.4 takeover score.
#4
@ BYU
Week 6 · L 20-27
1
Havoc Plays
63.1 takeover
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 63.1 takeover score.
#5
@ UTEP
Week 10 · W 44-23 · Conference game
2
Havoc Plays
52.5 takeover
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 52.5 takeover score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2020 Postseason · UTSA
9 primary output · 24.9 efficiency · 6.8 usage
58.9
#2
2020 Regular Season · UTSA
58.9
9 primary · 24.9 efficiency · 6.8 usage
#3
2019 Regular Season · UTSA
42.1
0 primary · 10.4 efficiency · 1.9 usage
4
Impact games
3
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.