Usage Score
11.1
Player Dossier
2015-2018Toledo
Tuzar Skipper
DL • 6'3" • 246 lbs • Norwich, CT, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Tuzar Skipper shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 34.6 disruption score.
Efficiency
34.6
Consistency
37.1
Season Value
30.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Toledo
151616171818
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Toledo
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Eastern Michigan
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Tuzar Skipper, DL. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Toledo. Tuzar Skipper shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 34.6 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
Toledo paired 20 primary output with 34.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 34.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Eastern Michigan
Loss with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Postseason · Toledo
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
1.5
Efficiency
34.6
Usage
11.1
Consistency
37.1
Best Game by takeover score
Florida International
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Florida International: 1. Unknown: 2. Miami: 0.5. Nevada: 2. Fresno State: 0. Bowling Green: 0.5. Eastern Michigan: 4.5. Buffalo: 2. Western Michigan: 3. Ball State: 0. Northern Illinois: 0. Kent State: 0. Central Michigan: 4.5
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Florida International: 8 by 43.3. Unknown: 3 by 32.5. Miami: 8 by 38.3. Nevada: 6 by 45. Fresno State: 4 by 16.7. Bowling Green: 4 by 21.7. Eastern Michigan: 8 by 78.3. Buffalo: 5 by 40.8. Western Michigan: 4 by 46.7. Ball State: 1 by 4.2. Northern Illinois: 3 by 12.5. Kent State: 1 by 4.2. Central Michigan: 5 by 65.8
Split Comparison
Wins1.7 · n=6 · +0.3 vs Losses
Losses1.3 · n=6 · -0.3 vs Wins
First Half1.5 · n=7 · -0.1 vs Second Half
Second Half1.6 · n=6 · +0.1 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Eastern Michigan
Best efficiency game
78.3 vs Eastern Michigan
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/21 | vs Florida International | L 32-35 | 8 | 6 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 11/23 | vs Central Michigan2+ sacks · Splash game | W 51-13 | 5 | 3 | — | 2.50 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 11/15 | @ Kent State | W 56-34 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 11/8 | @ Northern Illinois | L 15-38 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Wed 10/31 | vs Ball State | W 45-13 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 10/25 | @ Western Michigan | W 51-24 | 4 | 3 | — | 1.50 | 1.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/20 | vs Buffalo | L 17-31 | 5 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/13 | @ Eastern Michigan2+ sacks · Splash game | L 26-28 | 8 | 3 | — | 2.50 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/6 | vs Bowling Green | W 52-36 | 4 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/30 | @ Fresno State | L 27-49 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/22 | vs Nevada | W 63-44 | 6 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/15 | vs Miami | L 24-49 | 8 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/1 | vs Unknown | — | 3 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Toledo
2015-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
201520162016201720182018
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Toledo | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2016 Postseason | Toledo | 1 | 11.3 | 7.4 | 1 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Toledo | 1 | 11.3 | 7.4 | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Toledo | 2 | 26.7 | 16.3 | 1 |
| 2018 Postseason | Toledo | 20 | 34.6 | 11.1 | 18 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Toledo | 20 | 34.6 | 11.1 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Eastern Michigan
Loss with backfield disruption leading the way.
4.5
Primary metric
4.5 disruption/tackle impact with 68 takeover score.
#2
Central Michigan
4.5
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
4.5 disruption/tackle impact with 60.4 takeover score.
#3
Eastern Michigan
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 58.6 takeover score.
#4
Nevada
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 55.4 takeover score.
#5
Western Michigan
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 43 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2018 Postseason · Toledo
20 primary output · 34.6 efficiency · 11.1 usage
30.1
#2
2018 Regular Season · Toledo
30.1
20 primary · 34.6 efficiency · 11.1 usage
#3
2017 Regular Season · Toledo
24.2
2 primary · 26.7 efficiency · 16.3 usage
Milestones
2
Impact games
2
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
90
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 24 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.