Usage Score
29.9
Player Dossier
2016-2025Texas Tech
WR • 6'0" • 190 lbs • Shreveport, LA, USA
Marquez Stevenson reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
29.9
Efficiency
75.3
Consistency
59.6
Season Value
61.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · Texas Tech
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Marquez Stevenson, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · Texas Tech. Marquez Stevenson reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season
Texas Tech paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 75.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2025 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Houston, Texas Tech.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: SMU
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
75.6
Efficiency
75.3
Usage
29.9
Consistency
59.6
Best Game by takeover score
Navy
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Oklahoma: 80. Unknown: 25. Washington State: 34. Tulane: 95. North Texas: 64. Cincinnati: 120. UConn: 27. SMU: 211. UCF: 10. Memphis: 89. Tulsa: 19. Navy: 133
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oklahoma: 7 by 76.2. Unknown: 3 by 55.6. Washington State: 5 by 45.3. Tulane: 2 by 100. North Texas: 7 by 61. Cincinnati: 3 by 100. UConn: 2 by 90. SMU: 5 by 100. UCF: 2 by 33.3. Memphis: 5 by 100. Tulsa: 3 by 42.2. Navy: 8 by 100
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
SMU
Best efficiency game
100 vs Navy
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 12/1 | vs Navy100 receiving yards · High volume | L 41-56 | — | 8 | 133 | 15.4 | 16.60 | 2 | 47 |
| Sun 11/24 | @ Tulsa | W 24-14 | — | 3 | 19 | 6.3 | 6.30 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 11/16 | vs Memphis | L 27-45 | — | 5 | 89 | 17.8 | 17.80 | 1 | 53 |
| Sat 11/2 | @ UCF | L 29-44 | — | 2 | 10 | 6.5 | 5 | 0 | 11 |
| Thu 10/24 | vs SMU100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | L 31-34 | — | 5 | 211 | 33.5 | 42.20 | 2 | 96 |
| Sat 10/19 | @ UConn | W 24-17 | — | 2 | 27 | 13.7 | 13.50 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 10/12 | vs Cincinnati100 receiving yards | L 23-38 | — | 3 | 120 | 40 | 40 | 1 | 69 |
| Sun 9/29 | @ North Texas | W 46-25 | — | 7 | 64 | 9.1 | 9.10 | 0 | 32 |
| Fri 9/20 | @ Tulane | L 31-38 | — | 2 | 95 | 43 | 47.50 | 1 | 75 |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Washington State | L 24-31 | — | 5 | 34 | 7.1 | 6.80 | 1 | 18 |
| Sun 9/8 | vs Unknown | — | — | 3 | 25 | 8.3 | 8.30 | 0 | 20 |
| Sun 9/1 | @ Oklahoma | L 31-49 | — | 7 | 80 | 11.6 | 11.40 | 1 | 30 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Houston
2016-2020
Opening stop
Texas Tech
2025
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Houston | 36 | — | 0 | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | Houston | 0 | — | — | -36 |
| 2018 Postseason | Houston | 1,019 | 77.2 | 26.3 | 1,019 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Houston | 1,019 | 77.2 | 26.3 | 0 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Houston | 907 | 75.3 | 29.9 | -112 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Houston | 307 | 84.8 | 16.4 | -600 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 0 | — | — | -307 |
#1 Featured game
Navy
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
129
Primary metric
129 receiving yards with a 95.6 efficiency score.
#2
SMU
211
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
211 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Texas Tech
177
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
177 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Tulane
118
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
118 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Navy
141
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
141 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2025 Regular Season · Texas Tech
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2018 Postseason · Houston
64.1
1,019 primary · 77.2 efficiency · 26.3 usage
#3
2018 Regular Season · Houston
64.1
1,019 primary · 77.2 efficiency · 26.3 usage
10
100+ receiving yards
5
8+ catch outings
5
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2023 · Rating 0.8556
Waxahachie · Waxahachie, TX
Career Facts
2
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
2,269
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 33 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Marquez Stevenson quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit