Usage Score
4.3
Player Dossier
2016-2019Ball State
Chris Crumb
DT • 6'0" • 272 lbs • Lewis Center, OH, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Chris Crumb shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 21.5 disruption score.
Efficiency
17.2
Consistency
15.2
Season Value
12.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Ball State
16171819
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Ball State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Ohio
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Chris Crumb, DT. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Ball State. Chris Crumb shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 21.5 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season
Ball State paired 7 primary output with 21.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 17.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2019 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Notre Dame
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Regular Season · Ball State
Games
11
Havoc Plays / G
0.5
Efficiency
17.2
Usage
4.3
Consistency
15.2
Best Game by takeover score
Miami (OH)
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 0.5. Notre Dame: 2. Indiana: 0. Western Kentucky: 0. Kent State: 1.5. Northern Illinois: 0. Central Michigan: 1. Eastern Michigan: 0. Ohio: 0. Western Michigan: 1. Miami (OH): 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 2 by 13.3. Notre Dame: 2 by 28.3. Indiana: 1 by 4.2. Western Kentucky: 3 by 12.5. Kent State: 5 by 35.8. Northern Illinois: 2 by 8.3. Central Michigan: 1 by 14.2. Eastern Michigan: 3 by 12.5. Ohio: 1 by 4.2. Western Michigan: 7 by 39.2. Miami (OH): 4 by 16.7
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins1.2 · Games = 3 · +0.9 vs Losses
Losses0.3 · Games = 7 · -0.9 vs Wins
First Half0.7 · Games = 6 · +0.3 vs Second Half
Second Half0.4 · Games = 5 · -0.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Notre Dame
Best efficiency game
39.2 vs Western Michigan
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 11/21 | @ Miami (OH) | L 21-42 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Tue 11/13 | vs Western Michigan | W 42-41 | 7 | 0 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 10/25 | @ Ohio | L 14-52 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/20 | vs Eastern Michigan | L 20-42 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/13 | @ Central Michigan | W 24-23 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/6 | vs Northern Illinois | L 16-24 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/29 | vs Kent State | W 52-24 | 5 | 2 | — | 1.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/22 | vs Western Kentucky | L 20-28 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/15 | @ Indiana | L 10-38 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/8 | @ Notre Dame | L 16-24 | 2 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 8/30 | vs Unknown | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Ball State
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
2016201720182019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Ball State | 1.5 | 12.1 | 2.3 | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | Ball State | 2.5 | 10 | 2.6 | 1 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Ball State | 6 | 17.2 | 4.3 | 3.5 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Ball State | 7 | 21.5 | 7.4 | 1 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Ohio
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1
Primary metric
1 disruption/tackle impact with 51.7 takeover score.
#2
Unknown
1.5
Primary metric
Game with 1.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1.5 disruption/tackle impact with 50.2 takeover score.
#3
Notre Dame
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 45.6 takeover score.
#4
Unknown
1.5
Primary metric
Game with 1.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1.5 disruption/tackle impact with 44.3 takeover score.
#5
Western Kentucky
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 40 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2019 Regular Season · Ball State
7 primary output · 21.5 efficiency · 7.4 usage
24.9
#2
2018 Regular Season · Ball State
12.4
6 primary · 17.2 efficiency · 4.3 usage
#3
2017 Regular Season · Ball State
7
2.5 primary · 10 efficiency · 2.6 usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
1
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2016 · Rating 0.8089
Olentangy · Lewis Center, OH
- Committed To
- Ball State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2016
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
102
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 37 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.