Usage Score
0.3
Player Dossier
2015-2019Rice
Sam Glaesmann
WR • 6'3" • 225 lbs • Waco, TX, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Sam Glaesmann reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
—
Consistency
100
Season Value
50.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Rice
1516171819
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Rice
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: UAB
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Sam Glaesmann, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Rice. Sam Glaesmann reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season
Rice paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2017 Regular Season · Rice
Games
6
Receiving Yards / G
0
Efficiency
—
Usage
0.3
Consistency
100
Best Game by takeover score
UAB
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Stanford: 0. UTEP: 0. Houston: 0. UTSA: 0. Louisiana Tech: 0. UAB: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Scatter view is hidden because this season does not have enough game-to-game variety yet.
Split Comparison
Losses0 · n=5
First Half0 · n=3 · +0 vs Second Half
Second Half0 · n=3 · +0 vs First Half
All Games0 · n=6
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
6 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
UAB
Best efficiency game
— vs UAB
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Rice
2015-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
20152016201720182019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Rice | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Rice | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Rice | 0 | — | 0.3 | 0 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Rice | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Rice | 0 | — | — | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UAB
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
0
Primary metric
0 receiving yards with a — efficiency score.
#2
Louisiana Tech
0
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
0 receiving yards with a — efficiency score.
#3
UTSA
0
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
0 receiving yards with a — efficiency score.
#4
Houston
0
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
0 receiving yards with a — efficiency score.
#5
UTEP
0
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
0 receiving yards with a — efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2017 Regular Season · Rice
0 primary output · — efficiency · 0.3 usage
50.2
#2
2015 Regular Season · Rice
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · Rice
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
0
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 6 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.