Usage Score
16.7
Player Dossier
2016-2019North Texas
WR • 5'10" • 187 lbs • Sweetwater, TX, USA
Michael Lawrence reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
16.7
Efficiency
82.6
Consistency
61.4
Season Value
62.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · North Texas
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Michael Lawrence, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · North Texas. Michael Lawrence reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason
North Texas paired 819 primary output with 78.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 82.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2019 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Houston
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
55.1
Efficiency
82.6
Usage
16.7
Consistency
61.4
Best Game by takeover score
UAB
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 25. SMU: 44. California: 14. UTSA: 58. Houston: 120. Southern Miss: 15. Middle Tennessee: 55. Charlotte: 82. UTEP: 87. Louisiana Tech: 79. Rice: 38. UAB: 44
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 3 by 55.6. SMU: 5 by 58.7. California: 2 by 46.7. UTSA: 5 by 77.3. Houston: 9 by 88.9. Southern Miss: 1 by 100. Middle Tennessee: 4 by 91.7. Charlotte: 6 by 91.1. UTEP: 6 by 96.7. Louisiana Tech: 2 by 100. Rice: 3 by 84.4. UAB: 2 by 100
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Houston
Best efficiency game
100 vs UAB
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/30 | vs UAB | L 21-26 | — | 2 | 44 | 22 | 22 | 0 | 35 |
| Sat 11/23 | @ Rice | L 14-20 | — | 3 | 38 | 12.7 | 12.70 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 11/9 | @ Louisiana Tech | L 17-52 | — | 2 | 79 | 39.5 | 39.50 | 1 | 74 |
| Sat 11/2 | vs UTEP | W 52-26 | — | 6 | 87 | 14.5 | 14.50 | 0 | 28 |
| Sat 10/26 | @ Charlotte | L 38-39 | — | 6 | 82 | 13.7 | 13.70 | 1 | 34 |
| Sat 10/19 | vs Middle Tennessee | W 33-30 | — | 4 | 55 | 13.8 | 13.80 | 0 | 34 |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Southern Miss | L 27-45 | — | 1 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
| Sun 9/29 | vs Houston100 receiving yards · High volume | L 25-46 | — | 9 | 120 | 13.3 | 13.30 | 0 | 42 |
| Sat 9/21 | vs UTSA | W 45-3 | — | 5 | 58 | 11.6 | 11.60 | 0 | 30 |
| Sat 9/14 | @ California | L 17-23 | — | 2 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 9/7 | @ SMU | L 27-49 | — | 5 | 44 | 8.8 | 8.80 | 1 | 19 |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Unknown | — | — | 3 | 25 | 8.3 | 8.30 | 0 | 12 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
North Texas
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | North Texas | 16 | 100 | 6.7 | — |
| 2017 Postseason | North Texas | 819 | 78.2 | 18.1 | 803 |
| 2017 Regular Season | North Texas | 819 | 78.2 | 18.1 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | North Texas | 433 | 74.7 | 9.8 | -386 |
| 2018 Regular Season | North Texas | 433 | 74.7 | 9.8 | 0 |
| 2019 Regular Season | North Texas | 661 | 82.6 | 16.7 | 228 |
#1 Featured game
Rice
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
69
Primary metric
69 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Houston
120
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
120 receiving yards with a 88.9 efficiency score.
#3
UTSA
69
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
69 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Unknown
16
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
16 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Florida Atlantic
112
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
112 receiving yards with a 67.9 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2017 Postseason · North Texas
819 primary output · 78.2 efficiency · 18.1 usage
67.3
#2
2017 Regular Season · North Texas
67.3
819 primary · 78.2 efficiency · 18.1 usage
#3
2019 Regular Season · North Texas
62.1
661 primary · 82.6 efficiency · 16.7 usage
2
100+ receiving yards
3
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
1,929
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 40 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Michael Lawrence quick answers