Usage / Role
66%
Regular defensive contributor
Player Dossier
2015-2020Oklahoma State
LB • 6'1" • 220 lbs • Edmond, OK, USA
Calvin Bundage shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 28.3 disruption score.
Usage / Role
66%
Regular defensive contributor
Impact Production
100
Top-tier box-score impact for a linebacker
Reliability
100
Regular contributor with several takeover games
Star Power
74
High-upside career profile
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2020 Postseason · Oklahoma State
Snapshot
Player Story
Calvin Bundage built his college career from 2015 through 2020 as a linebacker from Edmond, OK wearing No. 1, spending time with Oklahoma State. The clearest part of Calvin Bundage's career was his defensive...
Read the storyCalvin Bundage, LB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2020 Postseason · Oklahoma State. Calvin Bundage shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 28.3 disruption score.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Tackles | TFL | Sacks | QB Hur | PD | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | - |
| 2016 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 6 | 13 | 1 | 0 | - | - | 0 | 10.1 |
| 2017 Postseason | Oklahoma State | 13 | 8 | 0.5 | 0.5 | - | - | 0 | 47.2 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 13 | 46 | 5 | 2.5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 47.2 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 11 | 62 | 8 | 1.5 | 4 | - | 0 | 54.6 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | - |
| 2020 Postseason | Oklahoma State | 10 | 2 | 0.5 | 0.5 | - | - | 0 | 64 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 10 | 18 | 8.5 | 6.5 | 6 | - | 0 | 64 |
Related Context
Calvin Bundage played LB for Oklahoma State. Across 6 tracked seasons, Calvin Bundage recorded 149 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2018 with Oklahoma State.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason
Oklahoma State paired 22 primary output with 28.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 26.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2020 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Oklahoma
Loss with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
1.0
Efficiency
26.9
Usage
6.5
Consistency
51.3
Best Game by takeover score
Oklahoma
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Virginia Tech: 1. Tulsa: 0. South Alabama: 0. Pittsburgh: 1. TCU: 2. Texas Tech: 0. Baylor: 1. Texas: 0. West Virginia: 1. Oklahoma: 4. Iowa State: 0. Kansas State: 2.5. Kansas: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Virginia Tech: 8 by 43.3. Tulsa: 3 by 12.5. South Alabama: 1 by 4.2. Pittsburgh: 2 by 18.3. TCU: 1 by 24.2. Texas Tech: 2 by 8.3. Baylor: 3 by 22.5. Texas: 5 by 20.8. West Virginia: 5 by 30.8. Oklahoma: 6 by 65. Iowa State: 4 by 16.7. Kansas State: 9 by 62.5. Kansas: 5 by 20.8
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Oklahoma
Best efficiency game
65 vs Oklahoma
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 12/28 | vs Virginia Tech | W 30-21 | 8 | 4 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/25 | vs Kansas | W 58-17 | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/18 | vs Kansas StateSplash game | L 40-45 | 9 | 5 | — | 2.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/11 | @ Iowa State | W 49-42 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/4 | vs Oklahoma2+ sacks · Splash game | L 52-62 | 6 | 4 | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/28 | @ West Virginia | W 50-39 | 5 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/21 | @ Texas | W 13-10 | 5 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/14 | vs Baylor | W 59-16 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/1 | @ Texas Tech | W 41-34 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/23 | vs TCUSplash game | L 31-44 | 1 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/16 | @ Pittsburgh | W 59-21 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/9 | @ South Alabama | W 44-7 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 8/31 | vs Tulsa | W 59-24 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Player Story
Calvin Bundage built his college career from 2015 through 2020 as a linebacker from Edmond, OK wearing No. 1, spending time with Oklahoma State. The clearest part of Calvin Bundage's career was his defensive production: 149 tackles, 23.5 tackles for loss, 11.5 sacks, and 1 pass defended across 40 career games in the available record. His largest box-score season came in 2018 with Oklahoma State. Those numbers show where he fit, how often the ball or action found him, and how his role developed over time.
Defensive careers can be hard to read from one number, but Calvin Bundage's production has multiple signals. With 40 career games in the available record, his career has enough shape to show both opportunity and production across Oklahoma State.
The arc is straightforward: Calvin Bundage moved through the depth chart, found a larger role, and turned that opportunity into production that can be understood through standard football numbers.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Oklahoma State
2015-2020
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 1 | 10.7 | 2.4 | 1 |
| 2017 Postseason | Oklahoma State | 12.5 | 26.9 | 6.5 | 11.5 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 12.5 | 26.9 | 6.5 | 0 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 13.5 | 35.8 | 8.4 | 1 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 0 | — | — | -13.5 |
| 2020 Postseason | Oklahoma State | 22 | 28.3 | 8.8 | 22 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 22 | 28.3 | 8.8 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
vs Boise State
Week 3 · W 44-21
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3
Havoc Plays
93.3 takeover
3 disruption/tackle impact with 93.3 takeover score.
#2
vs West Virginia
Week 4 · W 27-13 · Conference game
7
Havoc Plays
90.3 takeover
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
7 disruption/tackle impact with 90.3 takeover score.
#3
vs Oklahoma
Week 10 · L 52-62 · Conference game
4
Havoc Plays
88.3 takeover
Loss with backfield disruption leading the way.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 88.3 takeover score.
#4
vs Missouri State
Week 1 · W 58-17
3
Havoc Plays
86.4 takeover
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 86.4 takeover score.
#5
vs Kansas State
Week 12 · L 40-45 · Conference game
2.5
Havoc Plays
75 takeover
Loss with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 75 takeover score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2020 Postseason · Oklahoma State
22 primary output · 28.3 efficiency · 8.8 usage
64
#2
2020 Regular Season · Oklahoma State
64
22 primary · 28.3 efficiency · 8.8 usage
#3
2018 Regular Season · Oklahoma State
54.6
13.5 primary · 35.8 efficiency · 8.4 usage
9
Impact games
13
Splash games
2
10+ tackle games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.