Usage Score
11.1
Player Dossier
2017-2020Cincinnati
TE • 6'4" • 248 lbs • Montreal, PQ, Canada
Bruno Labelle reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
11.1
Efficiency
54.7
Consistency
58.4
Season Value
56
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Cincinnati
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Bruno Labelle, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Cincinnati. Bruno Labelle reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season
Cincinnati paired 15 primary output with 100 efficiency.
Supporting note
2020 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 54.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2020 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
5
Receiving Yards / G
16.2
Efficiency
54.7
Usage
11.1
Consistency
58.4
Best Game by takeover score
Georgia
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Georgia: 20. Unknown: 36. Army: 2. South Florida: 9. Tulsa: 14
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Georgia: 2 by 66.7. Unknown: 3 by 80. Army: 1 by 13.3. South Florida: 3 by 20. Tulsa: 1 by 93.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
5 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Unknown
Best efficiency game
93.3 vs Tulsa
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Cincinnati
2017-2020
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 15 | 100 | 6.7 | — |
| 2018 Postseason | Cincinnati | 46 | 30.7 | 10.4 | 31 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 46 | 30.7 | 10.4 | 0 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 9 | 30 | 9.5 | -37 |
| 2020 Postseason | Cincinnati | 81 | 54.7 | 11.1 | 72 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 81 | 54.7 | 11.1 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
East Carolina
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
15
Primary metric
15 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Unknown
36
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
36 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
#3
Temple
27
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
27 receiving yards with a 60 efficiency score.
#4
Marshall
9
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
9 receiving yards with a 30 efficiency score.
#5
Tulsa
14
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
14 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2017 Regular Season · Cincinnati
15 primary output · 100 efficiency · 6.7 usage
57.6
#2
2020 Postseason · Cincinnati
56
81 primary · 54.7 efficiency · 11.1 usage
#3
2020 Regular Season · Cincinnati
56
81 primary · 54.7 efficiency · 11.1 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2016 · Rating 0.8067
Cegep Garneau · Quebec City, QC
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
151
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 12 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Bruno Labelle quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit