Usage / Role
28%
Rotational offensive role
lowfeatured
Player Dossier
2016-2017Cincinnati
Devin Gray
WR • 6'0" • 177 lbs • Reno, NV, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Devin Gray reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Impact Production
72
High-end production for a receiver
lowelite
Reliability
74
Reliable weekly contributor
lowhigh
Star Power
73
High-upside career profile
limitedstar
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2016 Regular Season · Cincinnati
1617
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Unique Seasons
- 2
- Program Path
- Cincinnati
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Tulsa
Player Story
Devin Gray built his college career from 2016 through 2017 as a wide receiver from Reno, NV wearing No. 21, spending time with Cincinnati. The clearest part of Devin Gray's career was his receiving role: 86 catches,...
Read the storyDevin Gray, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2016 Regular Season · Cincinnati. Devin Gray reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Career production snapshot
- Receiving yards
- 1,304
- Receptions
- 86
- Touchdowns
- 8
Quick Answers
Devin Gray quick answers
- Latest team and position
- Cincinnati · WR
- Career Receiving Yards
- 1,304
- Tracked sample
- 2 unique seasons · 2 entries · 24 games
- Best season
- 2016 Regular Season · Cincinnati
- Top game
- Tulsa
- Latest roster
- No. 21 · Class 2017
- 2017 Receiving yards rank
- 444 receiving yards · WR 243rd (top 25%) · American Athletic 30th (top 18%) · National 274th (top 14%)
Season Ledger
Crawlable season-by-season stats
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 12 | 58 | 860 | 5 | 79.7 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 12 | 28 | 444 | 3 | 57.6 |
Related Context
Keep exploring Devin Gray
Devin Gray played WR for Cincinnati. Across 2 tracked seasons, Devin Gray recorded -2 rushing yards, 1,304 receiving yards, and 3 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2016 with Cincinnati.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
Cincinnati paired 860 primary output with 77.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 77.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2017 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tulsa
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Regular Season · Cincinnati
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
71.7
Efficiency
77.3
Usage
22.5
Consistency
66.9
Best Game by takeover score
Tulsa
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. UT Martin: 111. Purdue: 56. Houston: 97. Miami (OH): 67. South Florida: 13. UConn: 98. East Carolina: 98. Temple: 23. BYU: 105. UCF: 16. Memphis: 33. Tulsa: 143
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UT Martin: 5 by 100. Purdue: 4 by 93.3. Houston: 4 by 100. Miami (OH): 5 by 89.3. South Florida: 2 by 43.3. UConn: 9 by 72.6. East Carolina: 6 by 100. Temple: 4 by 38.3. BYU: 7 by 100. UCF: 3 by 35.6. Memphis: 4 by 55. Tulsa: 5 by 100
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins83 · Games = 4 · +17 vs Losses
Losses66 · Games = 8 · -17 vs Wins
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Tulsa
Best efficiency game
100 vs Tulsa
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/26 | @ Tulsa100 receiving yards | L 37-40 | — | 5 | 143 | 24.2 | 28.60 | 1 | 82 |
| Sat 11/19 | vs Memphis | L 7-34 | — | 4 | 33 | 5.2 | 8.30 | 1 | 16 |
| Sat 11/12 | @ UCF | L 3-24 | — | 3 | 16 | 5.3 | 5.30 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 11/5 | vs BYU100 receiving yards | L 3-20 | — | 7 | 105 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 31 |
| Sat 10/29 | @ Temple2+ TD | L 13-34 | — | 4 | 23 | 5.8 | 5.80 | 2 | 10 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs East Carolina | W 31-19 | — | 6 | 98 | 14.4 | 16.30 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ UConnHigh volume | L 9-20 | — | 9 | 98 | 10.9 | 10.90 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 10/1 | vs South Florida | L 20-45 | — | 2 | 13 | 6.5 | 6.50 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Miami (OH) | W 27-20 | — | 5 | 67 | 13.4 | 13.40 | 0 | 21 |
| Thu 9/15 | vs Houston | L 16-40 | — | 4 | 97 | 24.3 | 24.30 | 1 | 61 |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Purdue | W 38-20 | — | 4 | 56 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 29 |
| Thu 9/1 | vs UT Martin100 receiving yards | W 28-7 | — | 5 | 111 | 22.2 | 22.20 | 0 | 47 |
Player Story
Devin Gray story
Devin Gray built his college career from 2016 through 2017 as a wide receiver from Reno, NV wearing No. 21, spending time with Cincinnati. The clearest part of Devin Gray's career was his receiving role: 86 catches, 1,304 receiving yards, and 8 touchdowns across 24 career games in the available record. His largest box-score season came in 2016 with Cincinnati. Those numbers show where he fit, how often the ball or action found him, and how his role developed over time.
The value of the career arc is that it connects production to role, not just a name on a roster. His career also includes 3 tackles and 110 return yards, giving the story more than a single-category snapshot. With 24 career games in the available record, his career has enough shape to show both opportunity and production across Cincinnati.
The arc is straightforward: Devin Gray moved through the depth chart, found a larger role, and turned that opportunity into production that can be understood through standard football numbers.
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Cincinnati
2016-2017
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
20162017
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 860 | 77.3 | 22.5 | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 444 | 82.6 | 12.5 | -416 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
@ Tulsa
Week 13 · L 37-40 · Conference game
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
143
Receiving Yards
93.1 takeover
143 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
vs BYU
Week 10 · L 3-20
105
Receiving Yards
91.1 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
105 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
@ Navy
Week 4 · L 32-42 · Conference game
112
Receiving Yards
90.4 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
112 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
vs UT Martin
Week 1 · W 28-7
111
Receiving Yards
85.6 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
111 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
vs East Carolina
Week 8 · W 31-19 · Conference game
98
Receiving Yards
85.2 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
98 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by Season Value
2016 Regular Season · Cincinnati
860 primary output · 77.3 efficiency · 22.5 usage
79.7
#2
2017 Regular Season · Cincinnati
57.6
444 primary · 82.6 efficiency · 12.5 usage
Milestones
4
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Keep exploring Devin Gray
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.