Usage Score
12.5
Player Dossier
2016-2017Cincinnati
Devin Gray
WR • 6'0" • 177 lbs • Reno, NV, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Devin Gray reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
82.6
Consistency
54.2
Season Value
50.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Cincinnati
1617
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 2
- Program Path
- Cincinnati
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Tulsa
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Devin Gray, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Cincinnati. Devin Gray reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
Cincinnati paired 860 primary output with 77.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 82.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2017 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Navy
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2017 Regular Season · Cincinnati
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
37
Efficiency
82.6
Usage
12.5
Consistency
54.2
Best Game by takeover score
UConn
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 18. Michigan: 41. Miami (OH): 0. Navy: 112. Marshall: 68. UCF: 28. South Florida: 20. SMU: 41. Tulane: 49. Temple: 50. East Carolina: 12. UConn: 5
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 2 by 60. Michigan: 3 by 91.1. Navy: 6 by 100. Marshall: 3 by 100. UCF: 2 by 93.3. South Florida: 1 by 100. SMU: 3 by 91.1. Tulane: 2 by 100. Temple: 3 by 100. East Carolina: 2 by 40. UConn: 1 by 33.3
Split Comparison
Wins18 · n=3 · -28.5 vs Losses
Losses46.5 · n=8 · +28.5 vs Wins
First Half44.5 · n=6 · +15 vs Second Half
Second Half29.5 · n=6 · -15 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Navy
Best efficiency game
100 vs Temple
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/25 | vs UConn | W 22-21 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 11/18 | @ East Carolina | L 20-48 | — | 2 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 11/11 | vs Temple | L 24-35 | — | 3 | 50 | 16.7 | 16.70 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 11/4 | @ Tulane | W 17-16 | — | 2 | 49 | 24.5 | 24.50 | 1 | 39 |
| Sat 10/21 | vs SMU | L 28-31 | — | 3 | 41 | 13.7 | 13.70 | 1 | 21 |
| Sat 10/14 | @ South Florida | L 3-33 | — | 1 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 0 | 20 |
| Sun 10/8 | vs UCF | L 23-51 | — | 2 | 28 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 9/30 | vs Marshall | L 21-38 | — | 3 | 68 | 22.7 | 22.70 | 0 | 42 |
| Sat 9/23 | @ Navy100 receiving yards | L 32-42 | — | 6 | 112 | 18.7 | 18.70 | 1 | 46 |
| Sun 9/17 | @ Miami (OH) | W 21-17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/9 | @ Michigan | L 14-36 | — | 3 | 41 | 13.7 | 13.70 | 0 | 20 |
| Thu 8/31 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 18 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 11 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Cincinnati
2016-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
20162017
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 860 | 77.3 | 22.5 | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 444 | 82.6 | 12.5 | -416 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Tulsa
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
143
Primary metric
143 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Navy
112
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
112 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
BYU
105
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
105 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Unknown
111
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
111 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
East Carolina
98
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
98 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Regular Season · Cincinnati
860 primary output · 77.3 efficiency · 22.5 usage
66.5
#2
2017 Regular Season · Cincinnati
50.2
444 primary · 82.6 efficiency · 12.5 usage
Milestones
4
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
1,304
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 24 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.