Usage / Role
25%
Rotational defensive role
Player Dossier
2016-2019Army
DB • 6'0" • 200 lbs • Dacula, GA, USA
Cam Jones shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 30.2 disruption score.
Usage / Role
25%
Rotational defensive role
Impact Production
30
Developing production for a defensive back
Reliability
19
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
44
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2018 Regular Season · Army
Snapshot
Player Story
Cam Jones built his college career from 2016 through 2019 as a defensive back from Dacula, GA wearing No. 20, spending time with Army. The clearest part of Cam Jones' career was his defensive production: 82 tackles,...
Read the storyCam Jones, DB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2018 Regular Season · Army. Cam Jones shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 30.2 disruption score.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Tackles | TFL | Sacks | QB Hur | PD | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Postseason | Army | 3 | 0 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | 36 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Army | 3 | 2 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | 36 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Army | 9 | 29 | 1 | 0 | - | 1 | 0 | 18.3 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Army | 7 | 28 | 3.5 | 1 | - | 3 | 0 | 59.3 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Army | 4 | 23 | 0.5 | 0 | - | 1 | 0 | 56.3 |
Related Context
Cam Jones played DB for Army. Across 4 tracked seasons, Cam Jones recorded 82 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2017 with Army.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season
Army paired 7.5 primary output with 27.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 15.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Temple
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
9
Havoc Plays / G
0.2
Efficiency
15.7
Usage
3.2
Consistency
3.7
Best Game by takeover score
Temple
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Fordham: 0. Buffalo: 0. Ohio State: 0. Tulane: 0. UTEP: 0. Temple: 2. Air Force: 0. Duke: 0. North Texas: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Fordham: 6 by 25. Buffalo: 1 by 4.2. Ohio State: 4 by 16.7. Tulane: 3 by 12.5. UTEP: 3 by 12.5. Temple: 3 by 32.5. Air Force: 3 by 12.5. Duke: 3 by 12.5. North Texas: 3 by 12.5
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Temple
Best efficiency game
32.5 vs Temple
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/18 | @ North Texas | L 49-52 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/11 | vs Duke | W 21-16 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/4 | @ Air Force | W 21-0 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/21 | vs TempleSplash game | W 31-28 | 3 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/30 | vs UTEP | W 35-21 | 3 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/23 | @ Tulane | L 17-21 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/16 | @ Ohio State | L 7-38 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/9 | vs Buffalo | W 21-17 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 9/1 | vs Fordham | W 64-6 | 6 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Player Story
Cam Jones built his college career from 2016 through 2019 as a defensive back from Dacula, GA wearing No. 20, spending time with Army. The clearest part of Cam Jones' career was his defensive production: 82 tackles, 5 tackles for loss, 1 sack, and 1 interception across 23 career games in the available record. His career also includes 8 return yards, giving the story more than a single-category snapshot. That gives Cam Jones' career enough real context without stretching the story beyond the available production.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Army
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Postseason | Army | 0 | 2.8 | 0.6 | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Army | 0 | 2.8 | 0.6 | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Army | 2 | 15.7 | 3.2 | 2 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Army | 7.5 | 27.4 | 7 | 5.5 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Army | 2.5 | 30.2 | 11 | -5 |
#1 Featured game
@ San José State
Week 7 · W 52-3
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3
Havoc Plays
86.4 takeover
3 disruption/tackle impact with 86.4 takeover score.
#2
vs Morgan State
Week 4 · W 52-21
1
Havoc Plays
75.6 takeover
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 75.6 takeover score.
#3
vs Temple
Week 8 · W 31-28
2
Havoc Plays
65.3 takeover
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 65.3 takeover score.
#4
vs Rice
Week 1 · W 14-7
0.5
Havoc Plays
60 takeover
Win with 0.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0.5 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#5
@ Michigan
Week 2 · L 21-24
1
Havoc Plays
55.3 takeover
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 55.3 takeover score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2018 Regular Season · Army
7.5 primary output · 27.4 efficiency · 7 usage
59.3
#2
2019 Regular Season · Army
56.3
2.5 primary · 30.2 efficiency · 11 usage
#3
2016 Postseason · Army
36
0 primary · 2.8 efficiency · 0.6 usage
4
Impact games
3
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.