Usage Score
16.3
Player Dossier
2016-2019Army
Elijah Riley
DB • 6'0" • 205 lbs • Port Jefferson, NY, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Elijah Riley shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 41.2 disruption score.
Efficiency
41.2
Consistency
38.8
Season Value
30.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Army
161617171819
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Army
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Michigan
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Elijah Riley, DB. Best season Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season · Army. Elijah Riley shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 41.2 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Regular Season
Army paired 21 primary output with 41.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 41.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2019 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Michigan
Loss with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Regular Season · Army
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
1.6
Efficiency
41.2
Usage
16.3
Consistency
38.8
Best Game by takeover score
Navy
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Rice: 2. Michigan: 4. UTSA: 3. Unknown: 1. Tulane: 0. Western Kentucky: 4. Georgia State: 0. San José State: 3. Air Force: 2.5. Massachusetts: 1. Unknown: 0.5. Hawai'i: 0. Navy: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Rice: 4 by 36.7. Michigan: 13 by 90. UTSA: 4 by 46.7. Unknown: 5 by 30.8. Tulane: 4 by 16.7. Western Kentucky: 11 by 85.8. Georgia State: 7 by 29.2. San José State: 4 by 46.7. Air Force: 11 by 70.8. Massachusetts: 2 by 18.3. Unknown: 3 by 17.5. Hawai'i: 6 by 25. Navy: 5 by 20.8
Split Comparison
Wins2 · n=3 · +0.3 vs Losses
Losses1.7 · n=8 · -0.3 vs Wins
First Half2 · n=7 · +0.8 vs Second Half
Second Half1.2 · n=6 · -0.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Michigan
Best efficiency game
90 vs Michigan
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/14 | @ Navy | L 7-31 | 5 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 12/1 | @ Hawai'i | L 31-52 | 6 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/16 | vs Unknown | — | 3 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/9 | vs Massachusetts | W 63-7 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/2 | @ Air Force10+ tackles · Splash game | L 13-17 | 11 | 6 | — | 1.50 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/26 | vs San José State | L 29-34 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 3 | — | — |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Georgia State | L 21-28 | 7 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Western Kentucky10+ tackles | L 8-17 | 11 | 8 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 10/5 | vs Tulane | L 33-42 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Unknown | — | 5 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/14 | @ UTSASplash game | W 31-13 | 4 | 4 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/7 | @ Michigan10+ tackles · 2+ sacks | L 21-24 | 13 | 9 | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 8/30 | vs Rice | W 14-7 | 4 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Army
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
201620162017201720182019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Postseason | Army | 6.5 | 21.4 | 6.2 | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Army | 6.5 | 21.4 | 6.2 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Army | 6 | 28.7 | 8.1 | -0.5 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Army | 6 | 28.7 | 8.1 | 0 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Army | 17.5 | 33 | 11.2 | 11.5 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Army | 21 | 41.2 | 16.3 | 3.5 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Michigan
Loss with backfield disruption leading the way.
4
Primary metric
4 disruption/tackle impact with 73.4 takeover score.
#2
Western Kentucky
4
Primary metric
Loss with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 68.9 takeover score.
#3
Duke
4
Primary metric
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 62.4 takeover score.
#4
Miami (OH)
4
Primary metric
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 58.1 takeover score.
#5
Liberty
4
Primary metric
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 57.8 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2019 Regular Season · Army
21 primary output · 41.2 efficiency · 16.3 usage
30.6
#2
2018 Regular Season · Army
25
17.5 primary · 33 efficiency · 11.2 usage
#3
2017 Postseason · Army
23
6 primary · 28.7 efficiency · 8.1 usage
Milestones
3
Impact games
5
Splash games
3
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
198
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 42 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.