Usage Score
9.7
Player Dossier
2016-2017Arkansas State
Christian Booker
WR • 5'11" • 174 lbs • Union, SC, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Christian Booker reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
83.1
Consistency
68.7
Season Value
65.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Arkansas State
16161717
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Arkansas State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Auburn
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Christian Booker, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Arkansas State. Christian Booker reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason
Arkansas State paired 363 primary output with 83.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 83.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2017 Postseason · Arkansas State
Games
9
Receiving Yards / G
40.3
Efficiency
83.1
Usage
9.7
Consistency
68.7
Best Game by takeover score
Middle Tennessee
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Middle Tennessee: 58. Nebraska: 72. Unknown: 76. SMU: 42. Georgia Southern: 0. South Alabama: 18. Texas State: 18. UL Monroe: 40. Troy: 39
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Middle Tennessee: 4 by 96.7. Nebraska: 7 by 68.6. Unknown: 4 by 100. SMU: 3 by 93.3. Georgia Southern: 1 by 0. South Alabama: 1 by 100. Texas State: 1 by 100. UL Monroe: 3 by 88.9. Troy: 1 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins19.3 · n=3 · -26.5 vs Losses
Losses45.8 · n=5 · +26.5 vs Wins
First Half49.6 · n=5 · +20.9 vs Second Half
Second Half28.8 · n=4 · -20.9 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Unknown
Best efficiency game
100 vs Troy
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 12/17 | vs Middle Tennessee | L 30-35 | — | 4 | 58 | 14.5 | 14.50 | 1 | 41 |
| Sun 12/3 | vs Troy | L 25-32 | — | 1 | 39 | 39 | 39 | 1 | 39 |
| Sat 11/25 | @ UL Monroe | W 67-50 | — | 3 | 40 | 9.3 | 13.30 | 1 | 27 |
| Sat 11/18 | vs Texas State | W 30-12 | — | 1 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 11/11 | @ South Alabama | L 19-24 | — | 1 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 1 | 18 |
| Thu 10/5 | @ Georgia Southern | W 43-25 | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 9/23 | @ SMU | L 21-44 | — | 3 | 42 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 29 |
| Sat 9/16 | vs Unknown2+ TD | — | — | 4 | 76 | 19 | 19 | 2 | 38 |
| Sun 9/3 | @ Nebraska | L 36-43 | — | 7 | 72 | 10.3 | 10.30 | 0 | 17 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Arkansas State
2016-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
2016201620172017
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Postseason | Arkansas State | 194 | 53.8 | 16 | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Arkansas State | 194 | 53.8 | 16 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Arkansas State | 363 | 83.1 | 9.7 | 169 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Arkansas State | 363 | 83.1 | 9.7 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Auburn
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
92
Primary metric
92 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Unknown
76
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
76 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Middle Tennessee
58
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
58 receiving yards with a 96.7 efficiency score.
#4
Nebraska
72
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
72 receiving yards with a 68.6 efficiency score.
#5
SMU
42
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
42 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2017 Postseason · Arkansas State
363 primary output · 83.1 efficiency · 9.7 usage
65.4
#2
2017 Regular Season · Arkansas State
65.4
363 primary · 83.1 efficiency · 9.7 usage
#3
2016 Postseason · Arkansas State
40.7
194 primary · 53.8 efficiency · 16 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2023 · Rating 0.8304
Nolensville · Nolensville, TN
- Committed To
- Georgia Southern
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2023
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
557
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 16 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.