Usage / Role
83%
Major offensive role
Player Dossier
2017-2019Utah State
QB • 6'4" • 225 lbs • Bakersfield, CA, USA
Jordan Love is a balanced quarterback profile with 17.8 usage in the latest tracked season.
Usage / Role
83%
Major offensive role
Impact Production
77
High-end production for a quarterback
Reliability
100
Regular contributor with several takeover games
Star Power
67
Useful peak profile
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2019 Postseason · Utah State
Snapshot
Player Story
Jordan Love built his college career from 2017 through 2019 as a quarterback from Bakersfield, CA wearing No. 10, spending time with Utah State. The clearest part of Jordan Love's career was his passing role: 8,585...
Read the storyNFL Draft
Jordan Love, QB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2019 Postseason · Utah State. Jordan Love is a balanced quarterback profile with 17.8 usage in the latest tracked season.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Total Offense | Pass Yds | Rush Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Postseason | Utah State | 12 | 255 | 254 | 1 | 0 | 48.8 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Utah State | 12 | 1,541 | 1,377 | 164 | 10 | 48.8 |
| 2018 Postseason | Utah State | 13 | 362 | 359 | 3 | 5 | 64.2 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Utah State | 13 | 3,253 | 3,193 | 60 | 34 | 64.2 |
| 2019 Postseason | Utah State | 13 | 333 | 317 | 16 | 3 | 67.9 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Utah State | 13 | 3,244 | 3,085 | 159 | 17 | 67.9 |
Related Context
Jordan Love played QB for Utah State. Across 3 tracked seasons, Jordan Love recorded 8,585 passing yards, 403 rushing yards, and 1 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2018 with Utah State.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason
Utah State paired 3,577 primary output with 58.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 58.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: BYU
Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure. It landed in the 84.6th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Primary Metric / G
275.2
Efficiency
58.5
Usage
17.8
Consistency
74.7
Best Game by takeover score
BYU
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Kent State: 333. Wake Forest: 418. Stony Brook: 325. San Diego State: 284. Colorado State: 248. LSU: 122. Nevada: 188. Air Force: 98. BYU: 411. Fresno State: 418. Wyoming: 315. Boise State: 219. New Mexico: 198
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Kent State: 49 by 62.6. Wake Forest: 51 by 55.7. Stony Brook: 37 by 86.4. San Diego State: 50 by 53.9. Colorado State: 44 by 54.7. LSU: 32 by 36.5. Nevada: 41 by 48.4. Air Force: 27 by 50.5. BYU: 60 by 54.3. Fresno State: 45 by 77.5. Wyoming: 38 by 63. Boise State: 42 by 50.1. New Mexico: 38 by 66.9
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
BYU
Best efficiency game
86.4 vs Stony Brook
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/21 | @ Kent State300-yard game · 3+ TD | L 41-51 | 30 | 39 | 317 | 76.9 | 3 | 1 | 62.6 | 10 | 16 | 1.60 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 11/30 | @ New Mexico3+ TD | W 38-25 | 18 | 35 | 172 | 51.4 | 3 | 1 | 66.9 | 3 | 26 | 8.70 | 0 | 15 |
| Sun 11/24 | vs Boise State | L 21-56 | 21 | 36 | 229 | 58.3 | 1 | 1 | 50.1 | 6 | -10 | -1.70 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 11/16 | vs Wyoming | W 26-21 | 18 | 29 | 282 | 62.1 | 2 | 2 | 63 | 9 | 33 | 3.70 | 0 | 10 |
| Sun 11/10 | @ Fresno State300-yard game | W 37-35 | 30 | 39 | 388 | 76.9 | 2 | 0 | 77.5 | 6 | 30 | 5 | 0 | 17 |
| Sun 11/3 | vs BYU300-yard game | L 14-42 | 29 | 49 | 394 | 59.2 | 1 | 3 | 54.3 | 11 | 17 | 1.50 | 0 | 9 |
| Sun 10/27 | @ Air Force | L 7-31 | 14 | 23 | 114 | 60.9 | 1 | 0 | 50.5 | 4 | -16 | -4 | 0 | 0 |
| Sun 10/20 | vs Nevada | W 36-10 | 13 | 31 | 169 | 41.9 | 1 | 1 | 48.4 | 10 | 19 | 1.90 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/5 | @ LSU | L 6-42 | 15 | 30 | 130 | 50.0 | 0 | 3 | 36.5 | 2 | -8 | -4 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 9/28 | vs Colorado State | W 34-24 | 17 | 33 | 204 | 51.5 | 2 | 2 | 54.7 | 11 | 44 | 4 | 0 | 11 |
| Sun 9/22 | @ San Diego State | W 23-17 | 30 | 47 | 293 | 63.8 | 0 | 0 | 53.9 | 3 | -9 | -3 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Stony Brook | W 62-7 | 25 | 34 | 294 | 73.5 | 1 | 0 | 86.4 | 3 | 31 | 10.30 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 8/31 | @ Wake Forest300-yard game · 3+ TD | L 35-38 | 33 | 48 | 416 | 68.8 | 3 | 3 | 55.7 | 3 | 2 | 0.70 | 0 | 3 |
Player Story
Jordan Love built his college career from 2017 through 2019 as a quarterback from Bakersfield, CA wearing No. 10, spending time with Utah State. The clearest part of Jordan Love's career was his passing role: 8,585 passing yards, 60 touchdown passes, 1,124 attempts, and 403 rushing yards across 38 career games in the available record. His largest box-score season came in 2018 with Utah State. Those numbers show where he fit, how often the ball or action found him, and how his role developed over time.
Quarterback careers are usually judged first by volume, efficiency, and scoring chances. His career also includes 403 rushing yards and 1 tackle, giving the story more than a single-category snapshot. With 38 career games in the available record, his career has enough shape to show both opportunity and production across Utah State.
The arc is straightforward: Jordan Love moved through the depth chart, found a larger role, and turned that opportunity into production that can be understood through standard football numbers.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Utah State
2017-2019
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Postseason | Utah State | 1,796 | 58.5 | 12.6 | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | Utah State | 1,796 | 58.5 | 12.6 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Utah State | 3,615 | 63.2 | 9.9 | 1,819 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Utah State | 3,615 | 63.2 | 9.9 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Utah State | 3,577 | 58.5 | 17.8 | -38 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Utah State | 3,577 | 58.5 | 17.8 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
vs BYU
Week 10 · L 14-42
Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
411
Total Offense
75.5 takeover
411 total offense with 54.3 efficiency.
#2
@ UNLV
Week 8 · W 52-28 · Conference game
358
Total Offense
72.6 takeover
Win with 358 yards of offense and 80.1 efficiency.
358 total offense with 80.1 efficiency.
#3
@ Fresno State
Week 11 · W 37-35 · Conference game
418
Total Offense
72.2 takeover
Win with 418 yards of offense and 77.5 efficiency.
418 total offense with 77.5 efficiency.
#4
@ Air Force
Week 13 · L 35-38 · Conference game
316
Total Offense
68.8 takeover
Loss with 316 yards of offense and 72.2 efficiency.
316 total offense with 72.2 efficiency.
#5
@ Kent State
Week 1 · L 41-51 · Postseason
333
Total Offense
66 takeover
Loss with 333 yards of offense and 62.6 efficiency.
333 total offense with 62.6 efficiency.
#1 Season by Season Value
2019 Postseason · Utah State
3,577 primary output · 58.5 efficiency · 17.8 usage
67.9
#2
2019 Regular Season · Utah State
67.9
3,577 primary · 58.5 efficiency · 17.8 usage
#3
2018 Postseason · Utah State
64.2
3,615 primary · 63.2 efficiency · 9.9 usage
17
250+ passing yards
15
300+ total offense
11
3+ TD games
18
Above avg efficiency
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.