Usage Score
15.6
Player Dossier
2015-2021California
Demetris Robertson
WR • 6'0" • 190 lbs • Savannah, GA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Demetris Robertson reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
75.1
Consistency
67.5
Season Value
55.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · California
15161718191920202121
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 3
- Seasons Tracked
- 10
- Program Path
- California • Georgia • Auburn
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Washington State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Demetris Robertson, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · California. Demetris Robertson reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
California paired 767 primary output with 76.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2021 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 75.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2021 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 3 team stops, with role shifts visible across California, Georgia, Auburn.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Arkansas
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2021 Postseason · Auburn
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
40.8
Efficiency
75.1
Usage
15.6
Consistency
67.5
Best Game by takeover score
Houston
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Houston: 15. Akron: 28. Unknown: 61. Penn State: 23. LSU: 60. Georgia: 59. Arkansas: 81. Ole Miss: 55. Texas A&M: 10. Mississippi State: 40. South Carolina: 18. Alabama: 39
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Houston: 2 by 50. Akron: 3 by 62.2. Unknown: 3 by 100. Penn State: 5 by 30.7. LSU: 6 by 66.7. Georgia: 4 by 98.3. Arkansas: 2 by 100. Ole Miss: 3 by 100. Texas A&M: 1 by 66.7. Mississippi State: 2 by 100. South Carolina: 3 by 40. Alabama: 3 by 86.7
Split Comparison
Wins56 · n=4 · +26.9 vs Losses
Losses29.1 · n=7 · -26.9 vs Wins
First Half41 · n=6 · +0.5 vs Second Half
Second Half40.5 · n=6 · -0.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Arkansas
Best efficiency game
100 vs Mississippi State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 12/28 | vs Houston | L 13-17 | — | 2 | 15 | 3.3 | 7.50 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 11/27 | vs Alabama | L 22-24 | — | 3 | 39 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 29 |
| Sun 11/21 | @ South Carolina | L 17-21 | — | 3 | 18 | 5 | 6 | 1 | 10 |
| Sat 11/13 | vs Mississippi State | L 34-43 | — | 2 | 40 | 14 | 20 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 11/6 | @ Texas A&M | L 3-20 | — | 1 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 10/30 | vs Ole Miss | W 31-20 | — | 3 | 55 | 18.3 | 18.30 | 0 | 35 |
| Sat 10/16 | @ Arkansas | W 38-23 | — | 2 | 81 | 40.5 | 40.50 | 1 | 71 |
| Sat 10/9 | vs Georgia | L 10-34 | — | 4 | 59 | 14.8 | 14.80 | 0 | 29 |
| Sun 10/3 | @ LSU | W 24-19 | — | 6 | 60 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 9/18 | @ Penn State | L 20-28 | — | 5 | 23 | 4.6 | 4.60 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 9/11 | vs Unknown2+ TD | — | — | 3 | 61 | 24.3 | 20.30 | 2 | 28 |
| Sat 9/4 | vs Akron | W 60-10 | — | 3 | 28 | 8.8 | 9.30 | 0 | 13 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
California
2015-2017
Opening stop
- 2
Georgia
2018-2020
Peak year stop
- 3
Auburn
2021
Final stop
Season Progression
2015201620172018201920192020202020212021
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | California | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | California | 767 | 76.8 | 13.3 | 767 |
| 2017 Regular Season | California | 70 | 61.7 | 16.3 | -697 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Georgia | 0 | — | 0 | -70 |
| 2019 Postseason | Georgia | 333 | 64 | 15.2 | 333 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Georgia | 333 | 64 | 15.2 | 0 |
| 2020 Postseason | Georgia | 110 | 59.2 | 8.9 | -223 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Georgia | 110 | 59.2 | 8.9 | 0 |
| 2021 Postseason | Auburn | 489 | 75.1 | 15.6 | 379 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Auburn | 489 | 75.1 | 15.6 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Washington State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
141
Primary metric
141 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Unknown
58
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
58 receiving yards with a 96.7 efficiency score.
#3
Mississippi State
45
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
45 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Arkansas
81
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
81 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Tennessee
61
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
61 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Regular Season · California
767 primary output · 76.8 efficiency · 13.3 usage
63.4
#2
2021 Postseason · Auburn
55.3
489 primary · 75.1 efficiency · 15.6 usage
#3
2021 Regular Season · Auburn
55.3
489 primary · 75.1 efficiency · 15.6 usage
Milestones
2
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
3
Career teams
10
Seasons tracked
1,769
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 10 tracked seasons, 49 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.