Usage Score
5.2
Player Dossier
2016-2017Purdue
C.J. Parker
S • 6'1" • 205 lbs • Menifee, CA, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
C.J. Parker shows a ball-hunting defender profile with partial disruption data.
Efficiency
18.6
Consistency
13.3
Season Value
12.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Purdue
1617
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 2
- Program Path
- Purdue
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Iowa
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
C.J. Parker, S. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Purdue. C.J. Parker shows a ball-hunting defender profile with partial disruption data.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
Purdue paired 4 primary output with 18.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 18.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2017 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Iowa
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Regular Season · Purdue
Games
10
Havoc Plays / G
0.4
Efficiency
18.6
Usage
5.2
Consistency
13.3
Best Game by takeover score
Wisconsin
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 0. Nevada: 0. Maryland: 1. Illinois: 0. Iowa: 1. Nebraska: 1. Penn State: 0. Minnesota: 0. Northwestern: 1. Wisconsin: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 5 by 20.8. Nevada: 1 by 4.2. Maryland: 4 by 26.7. Illinois: 2 by 8.3. Iowa: 9 by 47.5. Nebraska: 1 by 14.2. Penn State: 2 by 8.3. Minnesota: 4 by 16.7. Northwestern: 2 by 18.3. Wisconsin: 5 by 20.8
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins0 · Games = 2 · -0.6 vs Losses
Losses0.6 · Games = 7 · +0.6 vs Wins
First Half0.4 · Games = 5 · +0 vs Second Half
Second Half0.4 · Games = 5 · +0 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Iowa
Best efficiency game
47.5 vs Iowa
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/19 | vs Wisconsin | L 20-49 | 5 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/12 | vs Northwestern | L 17-45 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/5 | @ Minnesota | L 31-44 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/29 | vs Penn State | L 24-62 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/22 | @ Nebraska | L 14-27 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Iowa | L 35-49 | 9 | 5 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Illinois | W 34-31 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Maryland | L 7-50 | 4 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Nevada | W 24-14 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Unknown | — | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Purdue
2016-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
20162017
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Purdue | 4 | 18.6 | 5.2 | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | Purdue | 0 | — | — | -4 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Iowa
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1
Primary metric
1 disruption/tackle impact with 53.3 takeover score.
#2
Maryland
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 45.3 takeover score.
#3
Northwestern
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 43.2 takeover score.
#4
Nebraska
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 39.8 takeover score.
#5
Wisconsin
0
Primary metric
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 8.2 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Regular Season · Purdue
4 primary output · 18.6 efficiency · 5.2 usage
12.1
#2
2017 Regular Season · Purdue
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2018 · Rating 0.753
Pearl-Cohn · Nashville, TN
- Committed To
- Austin Peay
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2018
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
35
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 11 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.