Usage Score
4.8
Player Dossier
2017-2021LSU
Cameron Lewis
S • 6'1" • 195 lbs • Monroe, LA, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Cameron Lewis shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 25 disruption score.
Efficiency
25
Consistency
6.1
Season Value
11.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · LSU
171819192021
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- LSU
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Cameron Lewis, S. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · LSU. Cameron Lewis shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 25 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season
LSU paired 0 primary output with 16.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2021 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 25 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2021 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Game with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2021 Regular Season · LSU
Games
11
Havoc Plays / G
0.5
Efficiency
25
Usage
4.8
Consistency
6.1
Best Game by takeover score
Texas A&M
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 3. Central Michigan: 0. Mississippi State: 0. Auburn: 0. Kentucky: 0. Florida: 0. Ole Miss: 0. Alabama: 2. Arkansas: 0. UL Monroe: 0. Texas A&M: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 2 by 38.3. Central Michigan: 2 by 8.3. Mississippi State: 6 by 25. Auburn: 0 by 0. Kentucky: 5 by 20.8. Florida: 9 by 37.5. Ole Miss: 5 by 20.8. Alabama: 6 by 45. Arkansas: 5 by 20.8. UL Monroe: 7 by 29.2. Texas A&M: 7 by 29.2
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins0 · Games = 5 · -0.4 vs Losses
Losses0.4 · Games = 5 · +0.4 vs Wins
First Half0.5 · Games = 6 · +0.1 vs Second Half
Second Half0.4 · Games = 5 · -0.1 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Unknown
Best efficiency game
45 vs Alabama
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 11/28 | vs Texas A&M | W 27-24 | 7 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/21 | vs UL Monroe | W 27-14 | 7 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/14 | vs Arkansas | L 13-16 | 5 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/6 | @ Alabama | L 14-20 | 6 | 4 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/23 | @ Ole Miss | L 17-31 | 5 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/16 | vs Florida | W 49-42 | 9 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/9 | @ Kentucky | L 21-42 | 5 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/3 | vs Auburn | L 19-24 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/25 | @ Mississippi State | W 28-25 | 6 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/18 | vs Central Michigan | W 49-21 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/12 | vs Unknown | — | 2 | 1 | — | 1.50 | 0.50 | — | 1 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
LSU
2017-2021
Opening stop
Season Progression
201720182019201920202021
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Regular Season | LSU | 0 | 4.2 | 0.6 | — |
| 2018 Regular Season | LSU | 0 | 16.7 | 2.8 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | LSU | 3 | 10.3 | 2.4 | 3 |
| 2019 Regular Season | LSU | 3 | 10.3 | 2.4 | 0 |
| 2020 Regular Season | LSU | 0 | 6.7 | 1.3 | -3 |
| 2021 Regular Season | LSU | 5 | 25 | 4.8 | 5 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2
Primary metric
2 disruption/tackle impact with 51.5 takeover score.
#2
Unknown
3
Primary metric
Game with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 48 takeover score.
#3
Alabama
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 41.7 takeover score.
#4
Alabama
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 23.3 takeover score.
#5
Florida
0
Primary metric
Win with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 14.6 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2018 Regular Season · LSU
0 primary output · 16.7 efficiency · 2.8 usage
39.8
#2
2020 Regular Season · LSU
36
0 primary · 6.7 efficiency · 1.3 usage
#3
2017 Regular Season · LSU
34.9
0 primary · 4.2 efficiency · 0.6 usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2016 · Rating 0.8871
Wossman · Monroe, LA
- Committed To
- LSU
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2016
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
87
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 29 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.