Usage Score
17.6
Player Profile
Shea Patterson
QB • 6'2" • 202 lbs • Shreveport, LA, USA
Balanced quarterback profileVolume operator
Shea Patterson is a balanced quarterback profile with 17.6 usage in the latest tracked season.
Efficiency
57.5
Consistency
78.2
Season Value
63.3
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Michigan
1415161718181919
Quick Facts
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Primary stop by seasons
- Ole Miss
- Best season by value score
- Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Michigan
- Peak game by takeover score
- Peak game by takeover score: Rutgers
Shea Patterson, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Michigan. Shea Patterson is a balanced quarterback profile with 17.6 usage in the latest tracked season.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
Michigan paired 2,851 primary output with 65.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 57.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Ole Miss, Michigan.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Michigan State
Win with 369 yards of offense and 67.4 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Postseason · Michigan
Games
13
Primary Metric / G
239.3
Efficiency
57.5
Usage
17.6
Consistency
78.2
Best Game by takeover score
Alabama
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Alabama: 237. Middle Tennessee: 231. Army: 189. Wisconsin: 218. Rutgers: 280. Iowa: 172. Illinois: 211. Penn State: 310. Notre Dame: 102. Maryland: 156. Michigan State: 369. Indiana: 351. Ohio State: 285
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Alabama: 45 by 45.5. Middle Tennessee: 38 by 62. Army: 37 by 56.3. Wisconsin: 35 by 47.1. Rutgers: 27 by 66.6. Iowa: 33 by 55.3. Illinois: 27 by 64.4. Penn State: 53 by 58.3. Notre Dame: 23 by 55.3. Maryland: 24 by 60.3. Michigan State: 41 by 67.4. Indiana: 35 by 61.3. Ohio State: 50 by 47.9
Split Comparison
Wins229 · n=9 · -33.5 vs Losses
Losses262.5 · n=4 · +33.5 vs Wins
First Half219.7 · n=7 · -42.5 vs Second Half
Second Half262.2 · n=6 · +42.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Michigan State
Best efficiency game
67.4 vs Michigan State
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 1/1 | @ Alabama | L 16-35 | 17 | 37 | 233 | 45.9 | 1 | 2 | 45.5 | 8 | 4 | 0.50 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 11/30 | vs Ohio State300-yard game | L 27-56 | 18 | 43 | 305 | 41.9 | 1 | 1 | 47.9 | 7 | -20 | -2.90 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 11/23 | @ Indiana300-yard game · 3+ TD | W 39-14 | 20 | 32 | 366 | 62.5 | 5 | 1 | 61.3 | 3 | -15 | -5 | 0 | 2 |
| Sat 11/16 | vs Michigan State300-yard game · 3+ TD | W 44-10 | 24 | 33 | 384 | 72.7 | 4 | 0 | 67.4 | 8 | -15 | -1.90 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 11/2 | @ Maryland | W 38-7 | 13 | 22 | 151 | 59.1 | 1 | 0 | 60.3 | 2 | 5 | 2.50 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Notre Dame | W 45-14 | 6 | 12 | 100 | 50.0 | 2 | 0 | 55.3 | 11 | 2 | 0.20 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Penn State | L 21-28 | 24 | 41 | 276 | 58.5 | 0 | 1 | 58.3 | 12 | 34 | 2.80 | 1 | 13 |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Illinois3+ TD | W 42-25 | 11 | 22 | 194 | 50.0 | 3 | 0 | 64.4 | 5 | 17 | 3.40 | 1 | 10 |
| Sat 10/5 | vs Iowa | W 10-3 | 14 | 26 | 147 | 53.8 | 0 | 1 | 55.3 | 7 | 25 | 3.60 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 9/28 | vs Rutgers3+ TD | W 52-0 | 17 | 23 | 276 | 73.9 | 1 | 1 | 66.6 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Sat 9/21 | @ Wisconsin | L 14-35 | 14 | 32 | 219 | 43.8 | 2 | 1 | 47.1 | 3 | -1 | -0.30 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Army | W 24-21 | 19 | 29 | 207 | 65.5 | 0 | 0 | 56.3 | 8 | -18 | -2.30 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Middle Tennessee3+ TD | W 40-21 | 17 | 29 | 203 | 58.6 | 3 | 0 | 62 | 9 | 28 | 3.10 | 0 | 15 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Ole Miss
2014-2017
Opening stop
- 2
Michigan
2018-2019
Final stop
Season Progression
20142015201620172018201820192019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 1,049 | 60.6 | 38.1 | 1,049 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 2,243 | 55.3 | 23.8 | 1,194 |
| 2018 Postseason | Michigan | 2,851 | 65.7 | 14.9 | 608 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Michigan | 2,851 | 65.7 | 14.9 | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Michigan | 3,111 | 57.5 | 17.6 | 260 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Michigan | 3,111 | 57.5 | 17.6 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Rutgers
Win with 260 yards of offense and 82.3 efficiency.
260
Primary metric
260 total offense with 82.3 efficiency.
#2
Texas A&M
402
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
402 total offense with 64.9 efficiency.
#3
Mississippi State
393
Primary metric
Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
393 total offense with 62.8 efficiency.
#4
Indiana
318
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
318 total offense with 73.2 efficiency.
#5
Unknown
495
Primary metric
Game with 495 yards of offense and 68.7 efficiency.
495 total offense with 68.7 efficiency.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2018 Postseason · Michigan
2,851 primary output · 65.7 efficiency · 14.9 usage
66.3
#2
2018 Regular Season · Michigan
66.3
2,851 primary · 65.7 efficiency · 14.9 usage
#3
2019 Postseason · Michigan
63.3
3,111 primary · 57.5 efficiency · 17.6 usage
Milestones
17
250+ passing yards
11
300+ total offense
1
3+ takeover TD games
19
Above avg efficiency
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
2
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
9,254
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 36 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Career Metric Focus
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.