Usage Score
7.7
Player Dossier
2016-2022Texas A&M
Clifford Chattman
S • 6'5" • 195 lbs • New Orleans, LA, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Clifford Chattman shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 32.3 disruption score.
Efficiency
32.3
Consistency
47
Season Value
29.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason · UTSA
1617181920212222
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Texas A&M • UTSA
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: North Texas
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Clifford Chattman, S. Best season Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason · UTSA. Clifford Chattman shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 32.3 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason
UTSA paired 19 primary output with 32.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 32.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2022 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Texas A&M, UTSA.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: North Texas
Win with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2022 Postseason · UTSA
Games
14
Havoc Plays / G
1.4
Efficiency
32.3
Usage
7.7
Consistency
47
Best Game by takeover score
Troy
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011121314
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Troy: 1. Houston: 1. Army: 0. Texas: 0. Unknown: 1. Middle Tennessee: 1.5. Western Kentucky: 2. Florida International: 0. North Texas: 3.5. UAB: 2. Louisiana Tech: 1. Rice: 3. UTEP: 1. North Texas: 2
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Troy: 4 by 26.7. Houston: 3 by 22.5. Army: 11 by 45.8. Texas: 6 by 25. Unknown: 8 by 43.3. Middle Tennessee: 2 by 23.3. Western Kentucky: 4 by 36.7. Florida International: 2 by 8.3. North Texas: 9 by 72.5. UAB: 7 by 49.2. Louisiana Tech: 1 by 14.2. Rice: 4 by 46.7. UTEP: 2 by 18.3. North Texas: 0 by 20
Split Comparison
Wins1.6 · n=10 · +0.9 vs Losses
Losses0.7 · n=3 · -0.9 vs Wins
First Half0.9 · n=7 · -0.9 vs Second Half
Second Half1.8 · n=7 · +0.9 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
North Texas
Best efficiency game
72.5 vs North Texas
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/16 | @ Troy | L 12-18 | 4 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 12/3 | vs North Texas | W 48-27 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/26 | vs UTEP | W 34-31 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/19 | @ Rice | W 41-7 | 4 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 11/12 | vs Louisiana Tech | W 51-7 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/5 | @ UAB | W 44-38 | 7 | 7 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 10/22 | vs North Texas | W 31-27 | 9 | 4 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 3 | — | — |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Florida International | W 30-10 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Western Kentucky | W 31-28 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Fri 9/30 | @ Middle Tennessee | W 45-30 | 2 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Unknown | — | 8 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 9/18 | @ Texas | L 20-41 | 6 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Army10+ tackles | W 41-38 | 11 | 7 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Houston | L 35-37 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Texas A&M
2016-2020
Opening stop
- 2
UTSA
2021-2022
Final stop
Season Progression
20162017201820192020202120222022
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 1 | 9.8 | 1.3 | — |
| 2017 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 0 | — | — | -1 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 5 | 23.8 | 3.7 | 5 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 0 | — | — | -5 |
| 2021 Regular Season | UTSA | 3 | 26.3 | 4.6 | 3 |
| 2022 Postseason | UTSA | 19 | 32.3 | 7.7 | 16 |
| 2022 Regular Season | UTSA | 19 | 32.3 | 7.7 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
North Texas
Win with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3.5
Primary metric
3.5 disruption/tackle impact with 61.5 takeover score.
#2
Mississippi State
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 49.9 takeover score.
#3
Illinois
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 48.1 takeover score.
#4
Rice
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 46.6 takeover score.
#5
New Mexico State
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 43.3 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2022 Postseason · UTSA
19 primary output · 32.3 efficiency · 7.7 usage
29.7
#2
2022 Regular Season · UTSA
29.7
19 primary · 32.3 efficiency · 7.7 usage
#3
2021 Regular Season · UTSA
18.7
3 primary · 26.3 efficiency · 4.6 usage
Milestones
1
Impact games
0
Splash games
2
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2016 · Rating 0.8622
McDonogh 35 · New Orleans, LA
- Committed To
- Texas A&M
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2016
Career Facts
2
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
116
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 29 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.